Scholars have characterized the relationship between a state center and regions, especially in federal states, as an ongoing bargaining game. The central objective in this study is to demonstrate the importance of political, economic, geographic and cultural determinants, or structural resources, in center-region relations in the Russian Federation during the 1990s. Structural resources have provided regional leaders with structural power in the federal bargaining game. According to my findings, politically superior, wealthy, culturally distinct, geopolitically and geoeconomically important and peripherally located regions were favored in the bilateral treaty process between 1994 and 1998 and were given chance to conclude treaties at an early stage.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
September 2003
Research Article|
September 01 2003
The significance of structural power resources in the Russian Bilateral treaty process 1994–1998
Peter J. Söderlund
Peter J. Söderlund
*
Ǻbo Akademi University, Faculty of Social and Caring Sciences, Vörägatan 9, 65100 Vasa, Finland
* * Tel.: +358-40-7223213; fax: +358-6-3247535. E-mail address: [email protected] (P.J. Söderlund).
Search for other works by this author on:
* * Tel.: +358-40-7223213; fax: +358-6-3247535. E-mail address: [email protected] (P.J. Söderlund).
Communist and Post-Communist Studies (2003) 36 (3): 311–324.
Citation
Peter J. Söderlund; The significance of structural power resources in the Russian Bilateral treaty process 1994–1998. Communist and Post-Communist Studies 1 September 2003; 36 (3): 311–324. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0967-067X(03)00041-2
Download citation file:
Sign in
Don't already have an account? Register
Client Account
You could not be signed in. Please check your email address / username and password and try again.
Could not validate captcha. Please try again.