One area which has been generally overlooked in the literature on institutional choice in post communist politics has been the design of judicial institutions. This paper seeks to evaluate a number of different explanations for judicial systems choice in post communist politics, especially those which emphasize the influence of socio-cultural factors, economic factors, the judicial legacies of the past, and political bargaining. As an empirical test of these explanations, we examine variations in the amount of judicial power that constitution makers granted to the constitutional courts in the countries of the former Soviet Union, Mongolia, and Eastern Europe.
Skip Nav Destination
Research Article| June 01 2000
Judicious choices: designing courts in postcommunist politics☆
Shannon Ishiyama Smithey;
John Ishiyama *
b Division of Social Science, 207B McClain Hall, Truman State University, Kirksville, MO 63501, USA
* Corresponding author. Tel: +1-660-785-4096; fax: +1-660-785-4181. E-mail addresses:email@example.com (S.I. Smithey), firstname.lastname@example.org (J. Ishiyama).
Search for other works by this author on:
☆ An earlier version of this paper was presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Atlanta, Georgia, September, 1999.
Communist and Post-Communist Studies (2000) 33 (2): 163–182.
- Views Icon Views
- Share Icon Share
- Search Site
Shannon Ishiyama Smithey, John Ishiyama; Judicious choices: designing courts in postcommunist politics. Communist and Post-Communist Studies 1 June 2000; 33 (2): 163–182. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0967-067X(00)00002-7
Download citation file: