In 1989, liberal Soviet intellectuals debated proposals for an authoritarian regime intended to speed marketization and allow political institutionalization during a transition to liberal democracy. The “authoritarians” were inspired by the work of neo-conservative Western scholars and Southern European, Latin American, and East Asian models. Their strategy was strongly opposed by a “democratic” camp of radical reformers. The “authoritarians” initially failed to carry the day, but in post-Soviet Russia, Boris Yeltsin's problems with a recalcitrant opposition and the sharp decline in living standards has rekindled interest in a strongman solution. The growth of elite and popular pro-anthoritarian sentiment has been accompanied by the gradual hardening of Yeltsin's “soft authoritarianism,” an outcome supported by sections of the intelligentsia that had vigorously opposed communist rule. The process points up the limits of democratic allegiance among radical-reform elites and intersects with a trend toward authoritarian solutions evident in other post-communist societies.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
March 1995
Research Article|
March 01 1995
The Devil to Pay: The 1989 Debate and the Intellectual Origins of Yeltsin's “Soft Authoritarianism” Available to Purchase
Barry Sautman
Barry Sautman
*
Division of Social Science, Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Clearwater Bay, Kowloon, Hong Kong
* Thanks arc due to Professors Alexander Motyl and Ding Xueling for their valuable comments.
Search for other works by this author on:
* Thanks arc due to Professors Alexander Motyl and Ding Xueling for their valuable comments.
Communist and Post-Communist Studies (1995) 28 (1): 131–151.
Citation
Barry Sautman; The Devil to Pay: The 1989 Debate and the Intellectual Origins of Yeltsin's “Soft Authoritarianism”. Communist and Post-Communist Studies 1 March 1995; 28 (1): 131–151. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/0967-067X(95)00008-9
Download citation file:
Sign in
Don't already have an account? Register
Client Account
You could not be signed in. Please check your email address / username and password and try again.
Could not validate captcha. Please try again.