...Cillian McHugh; Marek McGann; Eric R. Igou; Elaine L. Kinsella; Farid Anvari Moral dumbfounding occurs when people defend a moral judgment, without reasons in support of this judgment. The phenomenon has been influential in moral psychology, however, despite its influence, it remains poorly...

...Pierce Ekstrom; Calvin Lai; Brent Donnellan Moralized attitudes are the attitudes that people construe as matters of right and wrong. In this study, we examine how moralized attitudes relate to how people evaluate themselves using the Attitudes, Identities, and Individual Differences (AIID) dataset...

...Daniel Nettle; Rebecca Saxe; Alexa Tullett We postulate that at least two distinct cognitive systems affect political judgements. The first system, moral cognition, delivers intuitions about what societal outcomes would be ideal. The second system, which we dub the intuitive theory of social...

...Joshua M. Tybur; Catherine Molho; Begum Cakmak; Terence Dores Cruz; Gaurav Deep Singh; Maria Zwicker; Yoel Inbar; Morteza Dehghani People often report disgust toward moral violations. Some perspectives posit that this disgust is indistinct from anger. Here, we replicate and extend recent work...

... the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. See http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ . Inequality Morality Political...

...Cillian McHugh; Marek McGann; Eric R. Igou; Elaine L. Kinsella Moral dumbfounding is defined as maintaining a moral judgement, without supporting reasons. The most cited demonstration of dumbfounding does not identify a specific measure of dumbfounding and has not been published in peer-review form...