A growing body of literature has demonstrated that motivation influences cognitive processing. The breadth of these effects is extensive and span influences of reward, emotion, and other motivational processes across all cognitive domains. As examples, this scope includes studies of emotional memory, value-based attentional capture, emotion effects on semantic processing, reward-related biases in decision making, and the role of approach/avoidance motivation on cognitive scope. Additionally, other less common forms of motivation–cognition interactions, such as self-referential and motoric processing can also be considered instances of motivated cognition. Here I outline some of the evidence indicating the generality and pervasiveness of these motivation influences on cognition, and introduce the associated ‘research nexus’ at Collabra: Psychology.

Considering the scope of motivated cognition

Generally, motivation can be defined as goal-oriented behavior, often with the goal of maximizing pleasure and minimizing pain (Berridge, 2004; Hassin et al., 2009; Hughes & Zaki, 2015; Madan, 2013; see Kleinginna Jr. & Kleinginna, 1981, for an overview of different researchers’ definitions). As topics within the scope of of ‘motivated cognition’ often are considered more directly, I will first briefly describe a facet of this research area as an example. It is well known that emotion can influence how we attend to the world around us, such as in studies of the weapon-focus effect (Fawcett et al., 2013; Loftus et al., 1987; Steblay, 1992) and flash-bulb memories (Bohn & Berntsen, 2007; Brown & Kulik, 1977; Hirst et al., 2009). These findings lay the foundation for theories such as the attentional narrowing hypothesis (Easterbrook, 1959) and arousal-biased competition hypothesis (Mather & Sutherland, 2011) (though there is also evidence of a role of distinctiveness; Dewhurst & Parry, 2000; Pickel, 1998; Talmi & Moscovitch, 2004). However, a broader view would be to consider emotion-cognition interactions as segment of a more extensive literature on goal-oriented behavior and motivation, a domain-general perspective on the influences of motivational factors on cognition. For instance, rewards have been shown to similarly bias attention allocation, even when using considerably different experimental procedures (Anderson, 2013, 2016a; Awh et al., 2012). This broader view is in-line with recent perspectives on the influence of motivation on cognition (Botvinick & Braver, 2015; Braver et al., 2014; Chiew & Braver, 2011; Cunningham & Brosch, 2012; Gable & Harmon-Jones, 2010; Harmon-Jones et al., 2012a, b; Hughes & Zaki, 2015; Madan, 2013; Murty & Dickerson, 2017; Northoff & Hayes, 2011).

Emotion and reward

Considered broadly, emotion and reward processing bare many commonalities in their influence on cognition. For instance, both can preferentially capture attention (Aarts et al., 2008; Anderson, 2005, 2013, 2016a; Arnell et al., 2007; Bocanegra & Zeelenberg, 2009; MacKay et al., 2004; Raymond & O’Brien, 2009; Strange et al., 2003) and lead to impairments in processing of peripheral information information (Anderson, 2013; Anderson & Yantis, 2013; Bucker & Theeuwes, 2017; Dolcos et al., 2011; Kensinger et al., 2007; Talmi, 2013). Moreover, even when allowing for sufficient allocation of attention, both emotion and reward can impair memory for intentionally encoded contextual information (Madan et al., 2012a, 2017a, 2012b; Zimmerman & Kelley, 2010). Emotional arousal is often thought to be the principle dimension (as opposed to valence) (Bradley et al., 2001; Christianson, 1992; Mather & Sutherland, 2011; Talmi, 2013), and there is increasing evidence that ‘salience,’ an analogous dimension, is important to reward processing (Castel et al., 2016; Kahneman et al., 1993; Litt et al., 2011; Ludvig et al., 2014; Madan et al., 2014; Madan & Spetch, 2012; Tsetsos et al., 2012; Wispinski et al., 2017; Zeigenfuse et al., 2014). Providing more mechanistic similarities between emotion and reward, both have been shown to relate to autonomic function (e.g., pupil dilation and heart rate) (Abercrombie et al., 2008; Ariel & Castel, 2014; Bijleveld et al., 2009; Bradley et al., 2001, 2008; Buchanan et al., 2006; Fowles et al., 1982; Hochman & Yechiam, 2011; Manohar et al., 2017). Additionally, there are age-related differences in both emotion and reward processing, where older adults are more biased towards positively valenced and gain experiences, than negative/loss experiences (Barber et al., 2016; Carstensen & Mikels, 2005; Castel et al., 2016; Mikels & Reed, 2009; Mikels et al., 2016; Pachur et al., 2017; Samanez Larkin et al., 2007). This parallel may be somewhat exaggerated, however, as emotion and reward are sometimes experimentally operationalized similarly, and thus would produce similar effects in behavior. Specifically, both emotion and reward are often studied using shocks (Bauch et al., 2014; Bisby & Burgess, 2014; Dunsmoor et al., 2015; Jensen et al., 2007; Murty et al., 2012, 2011; Pessoa, 2009; Phelps & LeDoux, 2005; Redondo et al., 2014; Schmidt et al., 2015; Wang et al., 2013; Weiner & Walker, 1966), food (Beaver et al., 2006; de Water et al., 2017; Isen & Geva, 1987; LaBar et al., 2001; Polanía et al., 2015; Talmi et al., 2013; Wadlinger & Isaacowitz, 2006), emotional face pictures (Bradley et al., 1997; Lin et al., 2012; Tsukiura & Cabeza, 2008; Vrijsen et al., 2013; Vuilleumier & Schwartz, 2001; Woud et al., 2013), or erotic/sexual pictures (Attard-Johnson & Bindemann, 2017; Bradley et al., 2001; Ferrey et al., 2012; Hamann et al., 2004; Iigaya et al., 2016; Most et al., 2007; Sescousse et al., 2013a, 2010). As such, it would be expected that both emotion and reward demonstrate similar effects on cognition, as they can be studied using nearly identical experimental designs.

Despite these similarities between how emotion- and reward- processing are studied, there are also a variety of differences. Providing evidence of distinct roles of emotion and reward, when varied within the same experiment, the two factors can produce additive effects (Shigemune et al., 2010) or have otherwise been shown to separably influence behavior (Bennion et al., 2016; Bowen & Spaniol, 2017; Chiew & Braver, 2014; Isen et al., 1988; Mather & Schoeke, 2011; Otto et al., 2016). Emotion is often studied using stimuli that are inherently emotional–words, pictures, sounds, or videos that themselves semantically connote emotional content (Kensinger et al., 2007; MacKay et al., 2004; Madan et al., 2012a, 2017c; Shafer et al., 2012; Shigemune et al., 2010; Strange et al., 2003). In contrast, reward is often implemented as an instructional cue or feedback outcome (Adcock et al., 2006; Castel et al., 2002; Mason et al., 2017; Murayama & Kitagami, 2014; Murty et al., 2012; Pessiglione et al., 2007; Shigemune et al., 2010; Shohamy & Adcock, 2010; Spaniol et al., 2013). Though this dissociation is often true, there are exceptions—such as emotion studies where emotionally neutral stimuli are associated with emotional responses through a similar training task (Mather & Knight, 2008), emotional stimuli are presented just prior to the stimuli of interest (Qiao-Tasserit et al., 2017; Xie & Zhang, 2016, 2017), or with emotional stimuli are used as a feedback signal (Finn & Roediger, 2011). Similarly, in reward studies, items can be ‘trained’ to have a reward value before the task-of-interest (Anderson, 2013; Madan et al., 2012b; Madan & Spetch, 2012; Raymond & O’Brien, 2009), While a comparison of instructed vs. learned rewards has not been studied directly, there is a parallel with the literature on decisions from uncertainty. Specifically, studies have found differences in people’s risk preferences when decisions are made based on explicitly described odds and outcomes (‘decisions from description’), relative to those based on learned experiences (‘decisions from experience’) (Barron & Erev, 2003; Camilleri & Newell, 2011; Hertwig & Erev, 2009; Jessup et al., 2008; Ludvig et al., 2014; Ludvig & Spetch, 2011; Madan et al., 2017b; Mata et al., 2011; Yoon et al., 2017) (also see Braem et al., 2017).

A particularly interesting consideration when comparing the motivational characteristics of emotion and reward processing is the role of valence—emotional experiences can be either positive or negative (i.e., pleasant or unpleasant), rewards can be either gains or losses (though these could be gains and losses relative to expectations, based on either the average outcome or prior experiences). Within their respective literatures, when only one valence is included, it is often the case that only negatively valenced emotional effects are studied, whereas only gain reward outcomes are included. Given the growing literatures demonstrating valence effects in both emotion (Bowen et al., in press; Fredrickson & Branigan, 2005; Gasper & Clore, 2002; Kensinger & Corkin, 2004; Taylor, 1991; Xie & Zhang, 2016) and reward (Jensen et al., 2007; Kahneman & Tversky, 1984; Lejarraga & Hertwig, 2016; Litt et al., 2011; Ludvig et al., 2014; Samanez Larkin et al., 2007) effects on cognition, it is important to be aware of this limitation when only one valence is included in an experimental design. Motivation more generally can also be valenced, as a continuum of approach vs. avoidance motivation (Braver et al., 2014; Gable & Harmon-Jones, 2010; Kaplan et al., 2012; Murty et al., 2011; Vrijsen et al., 2013; Woud et al., 2013). Critically, this valence dimension of motivation does not directly map onto the valence of emotions or rewards. For instance, both anger and determination can be considered an approach motivation, while fear corresponds with avoidance (Carver & Harmon-Jones, 2009; Harmon-Jones et al., 2011, 2013).

Within the domain of rewards, there are a multitude of forms that a reward can take. Monetary rewards are the most common type of incentive; the use of shocks, and thus the avoidance of punishment, is also used often. However, it is important to consider that other rewards may yield different effects on cognition. Rather than examining these different rewards in isolation, a subset of studies have taken the approach of comparing their effects, or putting them in conflict. For instance, some studies have examined the motivational effects of monetary reward alongside another reward-related stimuli type, such as an appetitive juice reinforcer (Beck et al., 2010; Krug & Braver, 2014; Yee et al., 2016) or pain induction (Delgado et al., 2011; Murty et al., 2011; Read & Loewenstein, 1999; Talmi et al., 2009; Vlaev et al., 2014, 2009; Zhou & Gao, 2008). Other studies use what could be broadly considered a social reward, such as smiling face (Lin et al., 2012), indicator of social status (Izuma et al., 2008; Zink et al., 2008), or erotic pictures (Iigaya et al., 2016; Sescousse et al., 2013a, b). Additionally, some studies have investigated the motivational role of monetary feedback relative to verbal praise (e.g., “Very well done!”, “Great job!”) (Albrecht et al., 2014; Deci, 1971, 1972; Williams & DeSteno, 2008) though comparisons between reward categories have also been studied (Gross et al., 2014; Roper & Vecera, 2016; Rosati & Hare, 2016).

Other motivational factors

The extent of motivation on cognition is not constrained to emotion and reward. From the current perspective, other factors that lead to selective prioritization of cognitive processes also include the influences of motoric and self-referential processing.

While it is clear that emotion- and reward-related information are preferentially processed and modulate cognitive processes, it is likely less obvious that this may also be true for motor movements. It can be argued that the entire purpose of the brain is to produce movement–the ‘motor chauvinist’ view (Wolpert et al., 2001), a particularly strong perspective within the scope of embodied cognition. While this is an extreme stance, there is evidence that motor processes–such as enacted actions, gestures, and exercise–are beneficial to cognitive processes (Madan & Singhal, 2012b, c). Here motoric processing can be viewed as a type of goal-oriented behavior and in alignment with an approach motivation. A number of more subtle manipulations have demonstrated that cognitive processes can cue motor representations and influence motor movements, and that motor representations can modulate performance in cognitive tasks. For instance, in a simple task involving reaching for blocks and picking them up, grasping kinematics are influenced by text printed on the blocks, such as ‘long’ or ‘short’, as well as by words representing relative large or small objects (e.g., ‘apple’ or ‘grape’) (Gentilucci et al., 2000; Gentilucci & Gangitano, 1998; Glover et al., 2004). In the opposite direction, motor congruency of objects and pictures of objects, such as the side of a handle can influence response time and other measures in cognitive tasks (Brouillet et al., 2015; Buccino et al., 2009; Chum et al., 2007; Handy et al., 2003; Marino et al., 2014; Oakes & Onyper, 2017; Tucker & Ellis, 1998). Even more broadly, words and pictures representing objects varying in functionality can influence attention, semantic processing, and memory (Hauk et al., 2004; Madan et al., 2016; Madan & Singhal, 2012a; Montefinese et al., 2013; Pulvermüller, 2005; Shebani & Pulvermüller, 2013; Tousignant & Pexman, 2012; Witt et al., 2010). These effects are particularly interesting given debates regarding the role of evoked motor functionality information in response to pictures and words, as opposed to physical objects (Skiba & Snow, 2016; Snow et al., 2011, 2014; Squires et al., 2016; Wilson & Golonka, 2013). Taken together, functional objects can also capture attention, interfere with concurrent processes, and elicit approach motivation responses in ways that share commonalities with emotion and reward processes.

Self-referential processing can also be considered subset of motivated cognition. Unlike emotion-, reward-, and motor-processing, which are properties of the stimuli or how they are attended to, self-relevance is a property of the stimuli’s congruence with the participant. Often self relevance is studied using words that relate to the participant, such as personality trait adjectives (e.g., ‘curious’, ‘stingy’) (Fujiwara et al., 2008; Gutchess et al., 2007; Rogers et al., 1977; Symons & Johnson, 1997; Wentura et al., 2000) or autobiographical words (e.g., hometown, high school) (Gray et al., 2004; Yamawaki et al., in press). In other studies, self relevance is experimentally assigned, such as using sentences that refer to either ‘you’ or another person (Fields & Kuperberg, 2012) or by assigning the ownership of presented objects to the participant or ‘other’ (Cunningham et al., 2008; DeScioli et al., 2015; Truong et al., 2016, 2017). (See Northoff et al., 2006, for a review.) In some ways these two approaches align with the distinction outlined with emotion and reward studies, where the property can either be congruence between self and the stimuli (personality trait adjectives) or implemented as part of the task instructions (assigned ownership). Similar to both emotion and reward, self-referential stimuli can also elicit attentional capture (Alexopoulos et al., 2012; Arnell et al., 1999; Bargh, 1982; Tacikowski & Nowicka, 2010). This is particularly well exemplified by the ‘cocktail party effect,’ where people are able to focus on a particular conversation amidst a variety of concurrent sounds, but can readily and automatically attend to a different conversation if their name is mentioned (Conway et al., 2001; Moray, 1959; Wood & Cowan, 1995). Nonetheless, prior work has demonstrated that the effects of self-referential processing can be dissociated from reward (Northoff & Hayes, 2011) and emotion (Fields & Kuperberg, 2012, 2016; Grilli et al., in press; Kensinger & Gutchess, 2016) processes. In some studies, social cues have been used analogously to rewards, such as trial feedback (Anderson, 2016b, 2017) or in association with other stimuli, such as faces, as a signal for importance (Hargis & Castel, in press). More broadly, it has been shown that people exhibit a bias to pay more attention to pictures of their enemies and incidentally remembered more information about their enemies (Li et al., in press). Along this social dimension, people have also been found to have an ‘own-race bias,’ where people remembered faces of individuals of the same racial background better than those of another race (DeLozier & Rhodes, 2015). To some degree, cultural differences in attention and memory may also be influenced by collective self-referential effects, where cultural background leads to inter-individual differences in how contextual information is prioritized and attended to (Lin & Han, 2009; Masuda & Nisbett, 2001; Millar et al., 2013). In sum, studies of self-referential processing have demonstrated that we have a bias towards stimuli that correspond to ownership or our identity. The design of these self-referential studies share many commonalities with emotion and reward, in operationalization and in their observed influence on cognitive processing, providing additional support for a domain-general view of motivation-cognition interactions and goal-oriented behavior.

Importantly, the factors discussed thus far are not intended to be an exhaustive list of motivational factors known to influence cognitive processes. Beyond motoric and self-referential processing, numerous other distinct factors can also be construed as being instances of motivated cognition. For instance, people have also been shown to be able to prioritize memory for words representing allergens and medication side-effects that were instructed to be more severe (Friedman et al., 2015; Middlebrooks et al., 2016), similar to prior prioritization studies that used reward values (Castel et al., 2002). It has also been shown in a number of studies that words processed with their survival relevance in-mind are remembered better than in the context of several other instructions (Kang et al., 2008; Nairne & Pandeirada, 2008; Nairne et al., 2008, 2007; Soderstrom & McCabe, 2011; Weinstein et al., 2008). Food stimuli, briefly discussed as being used in both studies of emotion and reward, have also been studied in their own right as a means of probing motivational processes, particularly with interest in time-varying differences in motivation through satiation (Radel & Clément-Guillotin, 2012; Skrynka & Vincent, 2017; Wagner et al., 2012) and other measures of physiological homeostasis (Padulo et al., 2017; Tiedemann et al., 2017).

Conclusion

In sum, it is clear that motivation can guide cognition. These motivational factors–including, but not limited to, emotion and reward processes—modulate behavior across a variety of cognitive domains, often resulting in the prioritized processing of some stimuli. Nonetheless, many of the nuances of these motivation-cognition interactions have yet to be sufficiently understood. One general question is the specificity of these different motivational factors in modulating cognition. For instance, how much of what is known about the effects of emotion on memory can be considered domain-general characteristics of motivational salience and valence, rather than domain-specific effects of emotion? Along these lines, it is clear that emotion and reward, among other factors, necessitate unique research approaches (Gershman & Daw, 2017; Mattek et al., 2017; Panksepp et al., 2017; Schultz, 2015), but it is an open question where the boundaries lie between these different facets of motivation. More broadly, while the position of this perspective paper is that these factors can be summarized as ‘motivational factors’ despite a variety of differences–this is far from conclusive. It is well-established that there are different mechanisms and brain structures associated with these factors, but there nonetheless is a substantiative number of commonalities between them as well. My hope is that this perspective article will provide a new lens evaluate existing research and help to inspire further research to better understand how these constructs relate to each other.

Associated with this Perspective article is a new ‘research nexus’ at Collabra: Psychology, focused on fostering future research into motivated cognition. Briefly, a research nexus is similar to a special issue/collection in a journal, but in addition to invited authors and articles, the nexus will remain open for submissions, in order to create a growing collection of articles around the topic. In this newly launched research nexus, we welcome research into any individual motivational factor and their influence on cognition, as well as studies that compare or otherwise investigate the interactions between different motivational factors. While the perspective outlined here is suggestive that nearly all of cognition is motivated, manuscripts submitted to this research nexus must explicitly discuss how their research question and findings inform our understanding of the influence of motivation on cognition. Studies comparing different motivational factors are of particular interest, as this work is ultimately necessary to address open questions regarding the overlap or diversity in how different factors influence cognition.

Acknowledgments

I would like to thank Ryan Daley, Elizabeth, Kensinger, John Ksander, and Debbie Yee for feedback on an earlier draft of the manuscript.

Competing Interests

Christopher Madan is an Editor at Collabra: Psychology. He was not involved in the peer review of the article.

1
Aarts
 
H.
Custers
 
R.
Marien
 
H.
Preparing and motivating behavior outside of awareness
Science
2008
, vol. 
319
 (pg. 
1639
-
1639
)
2
Abercrombie
 
H. C.
Chambers
 
A. S.
Greischar
 
L.
Monticelli
 
R. M.
Orienting, emotion, and memory: phasic and tonic variation in heart rate predicts memory for emotional pictures in men
Neurobiology of Learning and Memory
2008
, vol. 
90
 (pg. 
644
-
650
)
3
Adcock
 
R. A.
Thangavel
 
A.
Whitfield-Gabrieli
 
S.
Knutson
 
B.
Gabrieli
 
J. D.
Reward-motivated learning: Mesolimbic activation precedes memory formation
Neuron
2006
, vol. 
50
 (pg. 
507
-
517
)
4
Albrecht
 
K.
Abeler
 
J.
Weber
 
B.
Falk
 
A.
The brain correlates of the effects of monetary and verbal rewards on intrinsic motivation
Frontiers in Neuroscience
2014
, vol. 
8
 pg. 
303
 
5
Alexopoulos
 
T.
Muller
 
D.
Ric
 
F.
Marendaz
 
C.
I, me, mine: Automatic attentional capture by self-related stimuli
European Journal of Social Psychology
2012
, vol. 
42
 (pg. 
770
-
779
)
6
Anderson
 
A. K.
Affective influences on the attentional dynamics supporting awareness
Journal of Experimental Psychology: General
2005
, vol. 
134
 (pg. 
258
-
281
)
7
Anderson
 
B. A.
A value-driven mechanism of attentional selection
Journal of Vision
2013
, vol. 
13
 (pg. 
7
-
7
)
8
Anderson
 
B. A.
The attention habit: how reward learning shapes attentional selection
Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences
2016a
, vol. 
1369
 (pg. 
24
-
39
)
9
Anderson
 
B. A.
Social reward shapes attentional biases
Cognitive Neuroscience
2016b
, vol. 
7
 (pg. 
30
-
36
)
10
Anderson
 
B. A.
Counterintuitive effects of negative social feedback on attention
Cognition and Emotion
2017
, vol. 
31
 (pg. 
590
-
597
)
11
Anderson
 
B. A.
Yantis
 
S.
Persistence of value-driven attentional capture
Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance
2013
, vol. 
39
 (pg. 
6
-
9
)
12
Ariel
 
R.
Castel
 
A. D.
Eyes wide open: enhanced pupil dilation when selectively studying important information
Experimental Brain Research
2014
, vol. 
232
 (pg. 
337
-
344
)
13
Arnell
 
K. M.
Killman
 
K. V.
Fijavz
 
D.
Blinded by emotion: Target misses follow attention capture by arousing distractors in RSVP
Emotion
2007
, vol. 
7
 (pg. 
465
-
477
)
14
Arnell
 
K. M.
Shapiro
 
K. L.
Sorensen
 
R. E.
Reduced repetition blindness for one’s own name
Visual Cognition
1999
, vol. 
6
 (pg. 
609
-
635
)
15
Attard-Johnson
 
J.
Bindemann
 
M.
Sex-specific but not sexually explicit: pupillary responses to dressed and naked adults
Royal Society Open Science
2017
, vol. 
4
 pg. 
160963
 
16
Awh
 
E.
Belopolsky
 
A. V.
Theeuwes
 
J.
Top–down versus bottom–up attentional control: a failed theoretical dichotomy
Trends in Cognitive Sciences
2012
, vol. 
16
 (pg. 
437
-
443
)
17
Barber
 
S. J.
Opitz
 
P. C.
Martins
 
B.
Sakaki
 
M.
Mather
 
M.
Thinking about a limited future enhances the positivity of younger and older adults’ recall: Support for socioemotional selectivity theory
Memory & Cognition
2016
, vol. 
44
 (pg. 
869
-
882
)
18
Bargh
 
J. A.
Attention and automaticity in the processing of self-relevant information
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
1982
, vol. 
43
 (pg. 
425
-
436
)
19
Barron
 
G.
Erev
 
I.
Small feedback-based decisions and their limited correspondence to description-based decisions
Journal of Behavioral Decision Making
2003
, vol. 
16
 (pg. 
215
-
233
)
20
Bauch
 
E. M.
Rausch
 
V. H.
Bunzeck
 
N.
Pain anticipation recruits the mesolimbic system and differentially modulates subsequent recognition memory
Human Brain Mapping
2014
, vol. 
35
 (pg. 
4594
-
4606
)
21
Beaver
 
J. D.
Lawrence
 
A. D.
van Ditzhuijzen
 
J.
Davis
 
M. H.
Woods
 
A.
Calder
 
A. J.
Individual differences in reward drive predict neural responses to images of food
Journal of Neuroscience
2006
, vol. 
26
 (pg. 
5160
-
5166
)
22
Beck
 
S. M.
Locke
 
H. S.
Savine
 
A. C.
Jimura
 
K.
Braver
 
T. S.
Primary and secondary rewards differentially modulate neural activity dynamics during working memory
PLoS ONE
2010
, vol. 
5
 pg. 
e9251
 
23
Bennion
 
K. A.
Payne
 
J. D.
Kensinger
 
E. A.
The impact of napping on memory for future-relevant stimuli: Prioritization among multiple salience cues
Behavioral Neuroscience
2016
, vol. 
130
 (pg. 
281
-
289
)
24
Berridge
 
K. C.
Motivation concepts in behavioral neuroscience
Physiology & Behavior
2004
, vol. 
81
 (pg. 
179
-
209
)
25
Bijleveld
 
E.
Custers
 
R.
Aarts
 
H.
The unconscious eye opener
Psychological Science
2009
, vol. 
20
 (pg. 
1313
-
1315
)
26
Bisby
 
J. A.
Burgess
 
N.
Negative affect impairs associative memory but not item memory
Learning & Memory
2014
, vol. 
21
 (pg. 
760
-
766
)
27
Bocanegra
 
B. R.
Zeelenberg
 
R.
Dissociating emotion-induced blindness and hypervision
Emotion
2009
, vol. 
9
 (pg. 
865
-
873
)
28
Bohn
 
A.
Berntsen
 
D.
Pleasantness bias in flashbulb memories: Positive and negative flashbulb memories of the fall of the berlin wall among east and west germans
Memory & Cognition
2007
, vol. 
35
 (pg. 
565
-
577
)
29
Botvinick
 
M.
Braver
 
T.
Motivation and cognitive control: From behavior to neural mechanism
Annual Review of Psychology
2015
, vol. 
66
 (pg. 
83
-
113
)
30
Bowen
 
H. J.
Kark
 
S. M.
Kensinger
 
E. A.
NEVER forget: negative emotional valence enhances recapitulation
Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
 
(in press)
31
Bowen
 
H. J.
Spaniol
 
J.
Effects of emotion and motivation on memory dissociate in the context of losses
Learning and Motivation
2017
, vol. 
58
 (pg. 
77
-
87
)
32
Bradley
 
B. P.
Mogg
 
K.
Millar
 
N.
Bonham-Carter
 
C.
Fergusson
 
E.
Jenkins
 
J.
Parr
 
M.
Attentional biases for emotional faces
Cognition & Emotion
1997
, vol. 
11
 (pg. 
25
-
42
)
33
Bradley
 
M. M.
Codispoti
 
M.
Cuthbert
 
B. N.
Lang
 
P. J.
Emotion and motivation i: Defensive and appetitive reactions in picture processing
Emotion
2001
, vol. 
1
 (pg. 
276
-
298
)
34
Bradley
 
M. M.
Miccoli
 
L.
Escrig
 
M. A.
Lang
 
P. J.
The pupil as a measure of emotional arousal and autonomic activation
Psychophysiology
2008
, vol. 
45
 (pg. 
602
-
607
)
35
Braem
 
S.
Houwer
 
J. D.
Demanet
 
J.
Yuen
 
K. S.
Kalisch
 
R.
Brass
 
M.
Pattern analyses reveal separate experience based fear memories in the human right amygdala
The Journal of Neuroscience
2017
, vol. 
37
 (pg. 
8116
-
8130
)
36
Braver
 
T. S.
Krug
 
M. K.
Chiew
 
K. S.
Kool
 
W.
Westbrook
 
J. A.
Clement
 
N. J.
Adcock
 
R. A.
Barch
 
D. M.
Botvinick
 
M. M.
Carver
 
C. S.
Cools
 
R.
Custers
 
R.
Dickinson
 
A.
Dweck
 
C. S.
Fishbach
 
A.
Gollwitzer
 
P. M.
Hess
 
T. M.
Isaacowitz
 
D. M.
Mather
 
M.
Murayama
 
K.
Pessoa
 
L.
Samanez-Larkin
 
G. R.
Somerville
 
L. H.
Mechanisms of motivation–cognition interaction: challenges and opportunities
Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience
2014
, vol. 
14
 (pg. 
443
-
472
)
37
Brouillet
 
D.
Brouillet
 
T.
Milhau
 
A.
Heurley
 
L.
Vagnot
 
C.
Brunel
 
L.
Word-to-picture recognition is a function of motor components mappings at the stage of retrieval
International Journal of Psychology
2015
, vol. 
51
 (pg. 
397
-
402
)
38
Brown
 
R.
Kulik
 
J.
Flashbulb memories
Cognition
1977
, vol. 
5
 (pg. 
73
-
99
)
39
Buccino
 
G.
Sato
 
M.
Cattaneo
 
L.
Rodà
 
F.
Riggio
 
L.
Broken affordances, broken objects: A TMS study
Neuropsychologia
2009
, vol. 
47
 (pg. 
3074
-
3078
)
40
Buchanan
 
T. W.
Etzel
 
J. A.
Adolphs
 
R.
Tranel
 
D.
The influence of autonomic arousal and semantic relatedness on memory for emotional words
International Journal of Psychophysiology
2006
, vol. 
61
 (pg. 
26
-
33
)
41
Bucker
 
B.
Theeuwes
 
J.
Pavlovian reward learning underlies value driven attentional capture
Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics
2017
, vol. 
79
 (pg. 
415
-
428
)
42
Camilleri
 
A. R.
Newell
 
B. R.
When and why rare events are underweighted: A direct comparison of the sampling, partial feedback, full feedback and description choice paradigms
Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
2011
, vol. 
18
 (pg. 
377
-
384
)
43
Carstensen
 
L. L.
Mikels
 
J. A.
At the intersection of emotion and cognition
Current Directions in Psychological Science
2005
, vol. 
14
 (pg. 
117
-
121
)
44
Carver
 
C. S.
Harmon-Jones
 
E.
Anger is an approach-related affect: Evidence and implications
Psychological Bulletin
2009
, vol. 
135
 (pg. 
183
-
204
)
45
Castel
 
A. D.
Benjamin
 
A. S.
Craik
 
F. I. M.
Watkins
 
M. J.
The effects of aging on selectivity and control in short-term recall
Memory & Cognition
2002
, vol. 
30
 (pg. 
1078
-
1085
)
46
Castel
 
A. D.
Friedman
 
M. C.
McGillivray
 
S.
Flores
 
C. C.
Murayama
 
K.
Kerr
 
T.
Drolet
 
A.
I owe you: age-related similarities and differences in associative memory for gains and losses
Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition
2016
, vol. 
23
 (pg. 
549
-
565
)
47
Chiew
 
K. S.
Braver
 
T. S.
Positive affect versus reward: Emotional and motivational influences on cognitive control
Frontiers in Psychology
2011
, vol. 
2
 pg. 
279
 
48
Chiew
 
K. S.
Braver
 
T. S.
Dissociable influences of reward motivation and positive emotion on cognitive control
Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience
2014
, vol. 
14
 (pg. 
509
-
529
)
49
Christianson
 
S.-Å.
Emotional stress and eyewitness memory: A critical review
Psychological Bulletin
1992
, vol. 
112
 (pg. 
284
-
309
)
50
Chum
 
M.
Bekkering
 
H.
Dodd
 
M. D.
Pratt
 
J.
Motor and visual codes interact to facilitate visuospatial memory performance
Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
2007
, vol. 
14
 (pg. 
1189
-
1193
)
51
Conway
 
A. R. A.
Cowan
 
N.
Bunting
 
M. F.
The cocktail party phenomenon revisited: The importance of working memory capacity
Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
2001
, vol. 
8
 (pg. 
331
-
335
)
52
Cunningham
 
S. J.
Turk
 
D. J.
Macdonald
 
L. M.
Macrae
 
C. N.
Yours or mine? ownership and memory
Consciousness and Cognition
2008
, vol. 
17
 (pg. 
312
-
318
)
53
Cunningham
 
W. A.
Brosch
 
T.
Motivational salience: Amygdala tuning from traits, needs, values, and goals
Current Directions in Psychological Science
2012
, vol. 
21
 (pg. 
54
-
59
)
54
Deci
 
E. L.
Effects of externally mediated rewards on intrinsic motivation
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
1971
, vol. 
18
 (pg. 
105
-
115
)
55
Deci
 
E. L.
The effects of contingent and noncontingent rewards and controls on intrinsic motivation
Organizational Behavior and Human Performance
1972
, vol. 
8
 (pg. 
217
-
229
)
56
Delgado
 
M. R.
Jou
 
R. L.
Phelps
 
E. A.
Neural systems underlying aversive conditioning in humans with primary and secondary reinforcers
Frontiers in Neuroscience
2011
, vol. 
5
 pg. 
71
 
57
DeLozier
 
S.
Rhodes
 
M. G.
The impact of value-directed remembering on the own-race bias
Acta Psychologica
2015
, vol. 
154
 (pg. 
62
-
68
)
58
DeScioli
 
P.
Rosa
 
N. M.
Gutchess
 
A. H.
A memory advantage for property
Evolutionary Psychology
2015
, vol. 
13
 (pg. 
411
-
423
)
59
de Water
 
E.
Mies
 
G. W.
Figner
 
B.
Yoncheva
 
Y.
van den Bos
 
W.
Castellanos
 
F. X.
Cillessen
 
A. H. N.
Scheres
 
A.
Neural mechanisms of individual differences in temporal discounting of monetary and primary rewards in adolescents
NeuroImage
2017
, vol. 
153
 (pg. 
198
-
210
)
60
Dewhurst
 
S. A.
Parry
 
L. A.
Emotionality, distinctiveness, and recollective experience
European Journal of Cognitive Psychology
2000
, vol. 
12
 (pg. 
541
-
551
)
61
Dolcos
 
F.
Iordan
 
A. D.
Dolcos
 
S.
Neural correlates of emotion–cognition interactions: A review of evidence from brain imaging investigations
Journal of Cognitive Psychology
2011
, vol. 
23
 (pg. 
669
-
694
)
62
Dunsmoor
 
J. E.
Murty
 
V. P.
Davachi
 
L.
Phelps
 
E. A.
Emotional learning selectively and retroactively strengthens memories for related events
Nature
2015
, vol. 
520
 (pg. 
345
-
348
)
63
Easterbrook
 
J. A.
The effect of emotion on cue utilization and the organization of behavior
Psychological Review
1959
, vol. 
66
 (pg. 
183
-
201
)
64
Fawcett
 
J. M.
Russell
 
E. J.
Peace
 
K. A.
Christie
 
J.
Of guns and geese: a meta-analytic review of the ‘weapon focus’ literature
Psychology, Crime & Law
2013
, vol. 
19
 (pg. 
35
-
66
)
65
Ferrey
 
A. E.
Frischen
 
A.
Fenske
 
M. J.
Hot or not: Response inhibition reduces the hedonic value and motivational incentive of sexual stimuli
Frontiers in Psychology
2012
, vol. 
3
 pg. 
575
 
66
Fields
 
E. C.
Kuperberg
 
G. R.
It’s all about you: An ERP study of emotion and self-relevance in discourse
NeuroImage
2012
, vol. 
62
 (pg. 
562
-
574
)
67
Fields
 
E. C.
Kuperberg
 
G. R.
Dynamic effects of self-relevance and task on the neural processing of emotional words in context
Frontiers in Psychology
2016
, vol. 
6
 pg. 
2003
 
68
Finn
 
B.
Roediger
 
H. L.
Enhancing retention through reconsolidation
Psychological Science
2011
, vol. 
22
 (pg. 
781
-
786
)
69
Fowles
 
D. C.
Fisher
 
A. E.
Tranel
 
D. T.
The heart beats to reward: The effect of monetary incentive on heart rate
Psychophysiology
1982
, vol. 
19
 (pg. 
506
-
513
)
70
Fredrickson
 
B. L.
Branigan
 
C.
Positive emotions broaden the scope of attention and thought-action repertoires
Cognition & Emotion
2005
, vol. 
19
 (pg. 
313
-
332
)
71
Friedman
 
M. C.
McGillivray
 
S.
Murayama
 
K.
Castel
 
A. D.
Memory for medication side effects in younger and older adults: The role of subjective and objective importance
Memory & Cognition
2015
, vol. 
43
 (pg. 
206
-
215
)
72
Fujiwara
 
E.
Levine
 
B.
Anderson
 
A. K.
Intact implicit and reduced explicit memory for negative self-related information in repressive coping
Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience
2008
, vol. 
8
 (pg. 
254
-
263
)
73
Gable
 
P.
Harmon-Jones
 
E.
The motivational dimensional model of affect: Implications for breadth of attention, memory, and cognitive categorisation
Cognition & Emotion
2010
, vol. 
24
 (pg. 
322
-
337
)
74
Gasper
 
K.
Clore
 
G. L.
Attending to the big picture: Mood and global versus local processing of visual information
Psychological Science
2002
, vol. 
13
 (pg. 
34
-
40
)
75
Gentilucci
 
M.
Benuzzi
 
F.
Bertolani
 
L.
Daprati
 
E.
Gangitano
 
M.
Language and motor control
Experimental Brain Research
2000
, vol. 
133
 (pg. 
468
-
490
)
76
Gentilucci
 
M.
Gangitano
 
M.
Influence of automatic word reading on motor control
European Journal of Neuroscience
1998
, vol. 
10
 (pg. 
752
-
756
)
77
Gershman
 
S. J.
Daw
 
N. D.
Reinforcement learning and episodic memory in humans and animals: An integrative framework
Annual Review of Psychology
2017
, vol. 
68
 (pg. 
101
-
128
)
78
Glover
 
S.
Rosenbaum
 
D. A.
Graham
 
J.
Dixon
 
P.
Grasping the meaning of words
Experimental Brain Research
2004
, vol. 
154
 (pg. 
103
-
108
)
79
Gray
 
H. M.
Ambady
 
N.
Lowenthal
 
W. T.
Deldin
 
P.
P300 as an index of attention to self-relevant stimuli
Journal of Experimental Social Psychology
2004
, vol. 
40
 (pg. 
216
-
224
)
80
Grilli
 
M. D.
Woolverton
 
C. B.
Crawford
 
M.
Glisky
 
E. L.
Self-reference and emotional memory effects in older adults at increased genetic risk of alzheimer’s disease
Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition
 
(in press)
81
Gross
 
J.
Woelbert
 
E.
Zimmermann
 
J.
Okamoto-Barth
 
S.
Riedl
 
A.
Goebel
 
R.
Value signals in the prefrontal cortex predict individual preferences across reward categories
Journal of Neuroscience
2014
, vol. 
34
 (pg. 
7580
-
7586
)
82
Gutchess
 
A. H.
Kensinger
 
E. A.
Yoon
 
C.
Schacter
 
D. L.
Ageing and the self-reference effect in memory
Memory
2007
, vol. 
15
 (pg. 
822
-
837
)
83
Hamann
 
S.
Herman
 
R. A.
Nolan
 
C. L.
Wallen
 
K.
Men and women differ in amygdala response to visual sexual stimuli
Nature Neuroscience
2004
, vol. 
7
 (pg. 
411
-
416
)
84
Handy
 
T. C.
Grafton
 
S. T.
Shroff
 
N. M.
Ketay
 
S.
Gazzaniga
 
M. S.
Graspable objects grab attention when the potential for action is recognized
Nature Neuroscience
2003
, vol. 
6
 (pg. 
421
-
427
)
85
Hargis
 
M. B.
Castel
 
A. D.
Younger and older adults’ associative memory for social information: The role of information importance
Psychology and Aging
, vol. 
32
 (pg. 
325
-
330
) 
(in press)
86
Harmon-Jones
 
C.
Schmeichel
 
B. J.
Mennitt
 
E.
Harmon-Jones
 
E.
The expression of determination: Similarities between anger and approach-related positive affect
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
2011
, vol. 
100
 (pg. 
172
-
181
)
87
Harmon-Jones
 
E.
Gable
 
P. A.
Price
 
T. F.
The influence of affective states varying in motivational intensity on cognitive scope
Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience
2012a
, vol. 
6
 
88
Harmon-Jones
 
E.
Gable
 
P. A.
Price
 
T. F.
The influence of affective states on cognitive broadening/narrowing: Considering the importance of motivational intensity
Social and Personality Psychology Compass
2012b
, vol. 
6
 (pg. 
314
-
327
)
89
Harmon-Jones
 
E.
Gable
 
P. A.
Price
 
T. F.
Does negative affect always narrow and positive affect always broaden the mind? considering the influence of motivational intensity on cognitive scope
Current Directions in Psychological Science
2013
, vol. 
22
 (pg. 
301
-
307
)
90
Hassin
 
R. R.
Aarts
 
H.
Eitam
 
B.
Custers
 
R.
Kleiman
 
T.
Non-conscious goal pursuit and the effortful control of behavior, 
Oxford handbook of human action
2009
New York
Oxford University Press
(pg. 
549
-
566
)
91
Hauk
 
O.
Johnsrude
 
I.
Pulvermüller
 
F.
Somatotopic representation of action words in human motor and premotor cortex
Neuron
2004
, vol. 
41
 (pg. 
301
-
307
)
92
Hertwig
 
R.
Erev
 
I.
The description–experience gap in risky choice
Trends in Cognitive Sciences
2009
, vol. 
13
 (pg. 
517
-
523
)
93
Hirst
 
W.
Phelps
 
E. A.
Buckner
 
R. L.
Budson
 
A. E.
Cuc
 
A.
Gabrieli
 
J. D. E.
Johnson
 
M. K.
Lustig
 
C.
Lyle
 
K. B.
Mather
 
M.
Meksin
 
R.
Mitchell
 
K. J.
Ochsner
 
K. N.
Schacter
 
D. L.
Simons
 
J. S.
Vaidya
 
C. J.
Long-term memory for the terrorist attack of september 11: Flashbulb memories, event memories, and the factors that influence their retention
Journal of Experimental Psychology: General
2009
, vol. 
138
 (pg. 
161
-
176
)
94
Hochman
 
G.
Yechiam
 
E.
Loss aversion in the eye and in the heart: The autonomic nervous system’s responses to losses
Journal of Behavioral Decision Making
2011
, vol. 
24
 (pg. 
140
-
156
)
95
Hughes
 
B. L.
Zaki
 
J.
The neuroscience of motivated cognition
Trends in Cognitive Sciences
2015
, vol. 
19
 (pg. 
62
-
64
)
96
Iigaya
 
K.
Story
 
G. W.
Kurth-Nelson
 
Z.
Dolan
 
R. J.
Dayan
 
P.
The modulation of savouring by prediction error and its effects on choice
eLife
2016
, vol. 
5
 pg. 
e13747
 
97
Isen
 
A. M.
Geva
 
N.
The influence of positive affect on acceptable level of risk: The person with a large canoe has a large worry
Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes
1987
, vol. 
39
 (pg. 
145
-
154
)
98
Isen
 
A. M.
Nygren
 
T. E.
Ashby
 
F. G.
Influence of positive affect on the subjective utility of gains and losses: It is just not worth the risk
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
1988
, vol. 
55
 (pg. 
710
-
717
)
99
Izuma
 
K.
Saito
 
D. N.
Sadato
 
N.
Processing of social and monetary rewards in the human striatum
Neuron
2008
, vol. 
58
 (pg. 
284
-
294
)
100
Jensen
 
J.
Smith
 
A. J.
Willeit
 
M.
Crawley
 
A. P.
Mikulis
 
D. J.
Vitcu
 
I.
Kapur
 
S.
Separate brain regions code for salience vs. valence during reward prediction in humans
Human Brain Mapping
2007
, vol. 
28
 (pg. 
294
-
302
)
101
Jessup
 
R. K.
Bishara
 
A. J.
Busemeyer
 
J. R.
Feedback produces divergence from prospect theory in descriptive choice
Psychological Science
2008
, vol. 
19
 (pg. 
1015
-
1022
)
102
Kahneman
 
D.
Fredrickson
 
B. L.
Schreiber
 
C. A.
Redelmeier
 
D. A.
When more pain is preferred to less: Adding a better end
Psychological Science
1993
, vol. 
4
 (pg. 
401
-
405
)
103
Kahneman
 
D.
Tversky
 
A.
Choices, values, and frames
American Psychologist
1984
, vol. 
39
 (pg. 
341
-
350
)
104
Kang
 
S. H. K.
McDermott
 
K. B.
Cohen
 
S. M.
The mnemonic advantage of processing fitness-relevant information
Memory & Cognition
2008
, vol. 
36
 (pg. 
1151
-
1156
)
105
Kaplan
 
R. L.
Damme
 
I. V.
Levine
 
L. J.
Motivation matters: Differing effects of pre-goal and post-goal emotions on attention and memory
Frontiers in Psychology
2012
, vol. 
3
 
106
Kensinger
 
E. A.
Corkin
 
S.
Two routes to emotional memory: Distinct neural processes for valence and arousal
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2004
, vol. 
101
 (pg. 
3310
-
3315
)
107
Kensinger
 
E. A.
Garoff-Eaton
 
R. J.
Schacter
 
D. L.
Effects of emotion on memory specificity: Memory trade-offs elicited by negative visually arousing stimuli
Journal of Memory and Language
2007
, vol. 
56
 (pg. 
575
-
591
)
108
Kensinger
 
E. A.
Gutchess
 
A. H.
Cognitive aging in a social and affective context: Advances over the past 50 years
The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences
2016
, vol. 
72
 (pg. 
61
-
70
)
109
Kleinginna
 
P. R.
Kleinginna
 
A. M.
A categorized list of motivation definitions, with a suggestion for a consensual definition
Motivation and Emotion
1981
, vol. 
5
 (pg. 
263
-
291
)
110
Krug
 
M. K.
Braver
 
T. S.
Motivation and cognitive control: Going beyond monetary incentives, 
The Psychological Science of Money
2014
Springer
(pg. 
137
-
162
)
111
LaBar
 
K. S.
Gitelman
 
D. R.
Parrish
 
T. B.
Kim
 
Y.-H.
Nobre
 
A. C.
Mesulam
 
M.-M.
Hunger selectively modulates corticolimbic activation to food stimuli in humans
Behavioral Neuroscience
2001
, vol. 
115
 (pg. 
493
-
500
)
112
Lejarraga
 
T.
Hertwig
 
R.
How the threat of losses makes people explore more than the promise of gains
Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
2016
, vol. 
24
 (pg. 
708
-
720
)
113
Li
 
L. M. W.
Masuda
 
T.
Lee
 
H.
Low relational mobility leads to greater motivation to understand enemies but not friends and acquaintances
British Journal of Social Psychology
 
(in press)
114
Lin
 
A.
Adolphs
 
R.
Rangel
 
A.
Social and monetary reward learning engage overlapping neural substrates
Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience
2012
, vol. 
7
 (pg. 
274
-
281
)
115
Lin
 
Z.
Han
 
S.
Self-construal priming modulates the scope of visual attention
Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology
2009
, vol. 
62
 (pg. 
802
-
813
)
116
Litt
 
A.
Plassmann
 
H.
Shiv
 
B.
Rangel
 
A.
Dissociating valuation and saliency signals during decision-making
Cerebral Cortex
2011
, vol. 
21
 (pg. 
95
-
102
)
117
Loftus
 
E. F.
Loftus
 
G. R.
Messo
 
J.
Some facts about “weapon focus”
Law and Human Behavior
1987
, vol. 
11
 (pg. 
55
-
62
)
118
Ludvig
 
E. A.
Madan
 
C. R.
Spetch
 
M. L.
Extreme outcomes sway risky decisions from experience
Journal of Behavioral Decision Making
2014
, vol. 
27
 (pg. 
146
-
156
)
119
Ludvig
 
E. A.
Spetch
 
M. L.
Of black swans and tossed coins: Is the description-experience gap in risky choice limited to rare events?
PLoS ONE
2011
, vol. 
6
 pg. 
e20262
 
120
MacKay
 
D. G.
Shafto
 
M.
Taylor
 
J. K.
Marian
 
D. E.
Abrams
 
L.
Dyer
 
J. R.
Relations between emotion, memory, and attention: Evidence from taboo stroop, lexical decision, and immediate memory tasks
Memory & Cognition
2004
, vol. 
32
 (pg. 
474
-
488
)
121
Madan
 
C. R.
Toward a common theory for learning from reward, affect, and motivation: the SIMON framework
Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience
2013
, vol. 
7
 
122
Madan
 
C. R.
Caplan
 
J. B.
Lau
 
C. S.
Fujiwara
 
E.
Emotional arousal does not enhance association-memory
Journal of Memory and Language
2012a
, vol. 
66
 (pg. 
695
-
716
)
123
Madan
 
C. R.
Chen
 
Y. Y.
Singhal
 
A.
ERPs differentially reflect automatic and deliberate processing of the functional manipulability of objects
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
2016
, vol. 
10
 
124
Madan
 
C. R.
Fujiwara
 
E.
Caplan
 
J. B.
Sommer
 
T.
Emotional arousal impairs association-memory: Roles of amygdala and hippocampus
NeuroImage
2017a
, vol. 
156
 (pg. 
14
-
28
)
125
Madan
 
C. R.
Fujiwara
 
E.
Gerson
 
B. C.
Caplan
 
J. B.
High reward makes items easier to remember, but harder to bind to a new temporal context
Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience
2012b
, vol. 
6
 
126
Madan
 
C. R.
Ludvig
 
E. A.
Spetch
 
M. L.
Remembering the best and worst of times: Memories for extreme outcomes bias risky decisions
Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
2014
, vol. 
21
 (pg. 
629
-
636
)
127
Madan
 
C. R.
Ludvig
 
E. A.
Spetch
 
M. L.
The role of memory in distinguishing risky decisions from experience and description
Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology
2017b
, vol. 
70
 (pg. 
2048
-
2059
)
128
Madan
 
C. R.
Shafer
 
A. T.
Chan
 
M.
Singhal
 
A.
Shock and awe: Distinct effects of taboo words on lexical decision and free recall
Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology
2017c
, vol. 
70
 (pg. 
793
-
810
)
129
Madan
 
C. R.
Singhal
 
A.
Encoding the world around us: Motor-related processing influences verbal memory
Consciousness and Cognition
2012a
, vol. 
21
 (pg. 
1563
-
1570
)
130
Madan
 
C. R.
Singhal
 
A.
Motor imagery and higher-level cognition: four hurdles before research can sprint forward
Cognitive Processing
2012b
, vol. 
13
 (pg. 
211
-
229
)
131
Madan
 
C. R.
Singhal
 
A.
Using actions to enhance memory: effects of enactment, gestures, and exercise on human memory
Frontiers in Psychology
2012c
, vol. 
3
 
132
Madan
 
C. R.
Spetch
 
M. L.
Is the enhancement of memory due to reward driven by value or salience?
Acta Psychologica
2012
, vol. 
139
 (pg. 
343
-
349
)
133
Manohar
 
S. G.
Finzi
 
R. D.
Drew
 
D.
Husain
 
M.
Distinct motivational effects of contingent and noncontingent rewards
Psychological Science
2017
, vol. 
28
 (pg. 
1016
-
1026
)
134
Marino
 
B. F. M.
Sirianni
 
M.
Volta
 
R. D.
Magliocco
 
F.
Silipo
 
F.
Quattrone
 
A.
Buccino
 
G.
Viewing photos and reading nouns of natural graspable objects similarly modulate motor responses
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
2014
pg. 
8
 
135
Mason
 
A.
Farrell
 
S.
Howard-Jones
 
P.
Ludwig
 
C. J.
The role of reward and reward uncertainty in episodic memory
Journal of Memory and Language
2017
, vol. 
96
 (pg. 
62
-
77
)
136
Masuda
 
T.
Nisbett
 
R. E.
Attending holistically versus analytically: Comparing the context sensitivity of Japanese and americans
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
2001
, vol. 
81
 (pg. 
922
-
934
)
137
Mata
 
R.
Josef
 
A. K.
Samanez-Larkin
 
G. R.
Hertwig
 
R.
Age differences in risky choice: a meta-analysis
Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences
2011
, vol. 
1235
 (pg. 
18
-
29
)
138
Mather
 
M.
Knight
 
M.
The emotional harbinger effect: Poor context memory for cues that previously predicted something arousing
Emotion
2008
, vol. 
8
 (pg. 
850
-
860
)
139
Mather
 
M.
Schoeke
 
A.
Positive outcomes enhance incidental learning for both younger and older adults
Frontiers in Neuroscience
2011
, vol. 
5
 
140
Mather
 
M.
Sutherland
 
M. R.
Arousal-biased competition in perception and memory
Perspectives on Psychological Science
2011
, vol. 
6
 (pg. 
114
-
133
)
141
Mattek
 
A. M.
Wolford
 
G. L.
Whalen
 
P. J.
A mathematical model captures the structure of subjective affect
Perspectives on Psychological Science
2017
, vol. 
12
 (pg. 
508
-
526
)
142
Middlebrooks
 
C. D.
McGillivray
 
S.
Murayama
 
K.
Castel
 
A. D.
Memory for allergies and health foods: How younger and older adults strategically remember critical health information
Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences
2016
, vol. 
71
 (pg. 
389
-
399
)
143
Mikels
 
J. A.
Reed
 
A. E.
Monetary losses do not loom large in later life: Age differences in the framing effect
Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences
2009
, vol. 
64B
 (pg. 
457
-
460
)
144
Mikels
 
J. A.
Shuster
 
M. M.
Thai
 
S. T.
Smith-Ray
 
R.
Waugh
 
C. E.
Roth
 
K.
Keilly
 
A.
Stine-Morrow
 
E. A. L.
Messages that matter: Age differences in affective responses to framed health messages
Psychology and Aging
2016
, vol. 
31
 (pg. 
409
-
414
)
145
Millar
 
P. R.
Serbun
 
S. J.
Vadalia
 
A.
Gutchess
 
A. H.
Cross-cultural differences in memory specificity
Culture and Brain
2013
, vol. 
1
 (pg. 
138
-
157
)
146
Montefinese
 
M.
Ambrosini
 
E.
Fairfield
 
B.
Mammarella
 
N.
The ‘subjective’ pupil old/new effect: Is the truth plain to see?
International Journal of Psychophysiology
2013
, vol. 
89
 (pg. 
48
-
56
)
147
Moray
 
N.
Attention in dichotic listening: Affective cues and the influence of instructions
Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology
1959
, vol. 
11
 (pg. 
56
-
60
)
148
Most
 
S. B.
Smith
 
S. D.
Cooter
 
A. B.
Levy
 
B. N.
Zald
 
D. H.
The naked truth: Positive, arousing distractors impair rapid target perception
Cognition & Emotion
2007
, vol. 
21
 (pg. 
964
-
981
)
149
Murayama
 
K.
Kitagami
 
S.
Consolidation power of extrinsic rewards: Reward cues enhance long-term memory for irrelevant past events
Journal of Experimental Psychology: General
2014
, vol. 
143
 (pg. 
15
-
20
)
150
Murty
 
V. P.
Dickerson
 
K. C.
Motivational influences on memory, 
Advances in Motivation and Achievement
2017
Emerald Group Publishing Limited
(pg. 
203
-
227
)
151
Murty
 
V. P.
LaBar
 
K. S.
Adcock
 
R. A.
Threat of punishment motivates memory encoding via amygdala, not midbrain, interactions with the medial temporal lobe
Journal of Neuroscience
2012
, vol. 
32
 (pg. 
8969
-
8976
)
152
Murty
 
V. P.
LaBar
 
K. S.
Hamilton
 
D. A.
Adcock
 
R. A.
Is all motivation good for learning? dissociable influences of approach and avoidance motivation in declarative memory
Learning & Memory
2011
, vol. 
18
 (pg. 
712
-
717
)
153
Nairne
 
J. S.
Pandeirada
 
J. N. S.
Adaptive memory: Is survival processing special?
Journal of Memory and Language
2008
, vol. 
59
 (pg. 
377
-
385
)
154
Nairne
 
J. S.
Pandeirada
 
J. N. S.
Thompson
 
S. R.
Adaptive memory: The comparative value of survival processing
Psychological Science
2008
, vol. 
19
 (pg. 
176
-
180
)
155
Nairne
 
J. S.
Thompson
 
S. R.
Pandeirada
 
J. N. S.
Adaptive memory: Survival processing enhances retention
Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition
2007
, vol. 
33
 (pg. 
263
-
273
)
156
Northoff
 
G.
Hayes
 
D. J.
Is our self nothing but reward?
Biological Psychiatry
2011
, vol. 
69
 (pg. 
1019
-
1025
)
157
Northoff
 
G.
Heinzel
 
A.
de Greck
 
M.
Bermpohl
 
F.
Dobrowolny
 
H.
Panksepp
 
J.
Self-referential processing in our brain: A meta-analysis of imaging studies on the self
NeuroImage
2006
, vol. 
31
 (pg. 
440
-
457
)
158
Oakes
 
M. A.
Onyper
 
S. V.
The movement-induced self-reference effect: enhancing memorability through movement toward the self
Cognitive Processing
2017
159
Otto
 
A. R.
Fleming
 
S. M.
Glimcher
 
P. W.
Unexpected but incidental positive outcomes predict real-world gambling
Psychological Science
2016
, vol. 
27
 (pg. 
299
-
311
)
160
Pachur
 
T.
Mata
 
R.
Hertwig
 
R.
Who dares, who errs? disentangling cognitive and motivational roots of age differences in decisions under risk
Psychological Science
2017
, vol. 
28
 (pg. 
504
-
518
)
161
Padulo
 
C.
Carlucci
 
L.
Manippa
 
V.
Marzoli
 
D.
Saggino
 
A.
Tommasi
 
L.
Puglisi-Allegra
 
S.
Brancucci
 
A.
Valence, familiarity and arousal of different foods in relation to age, sex and weight
Food Quality and Preference
2017
, vol. 
57
 (pg. 
104
-
113
)
162
Panksepp
 
J.
Lane
 
R. D.
Solms
 
M.
Smith
 
R.
Reconciling cognitive and affective neuroscience perspectives on the brain basis of emotional experience
Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews
2017
, vol. 
76
 (pg. 
187
-
215
)
163
Pessiglione
 
M.
Schmidt
 
L.
Draganski
 
B.
Kalisch
 
R.
Lau
 
H.
Dolan
 
R. J.
Frith
 
C. D.
How the brain translates money into force: A neuroimaging study of subliminal motivation
Science
2007
, vol. 
316
 (pg. 
904
-
906
)
164
Pessoa
 
L.
How do emotion and motivation direct executive control?
Trends in Cognitive Sciences
2009
, vol. 
13
 (pg. 
160
-
166
)
165
Phelps
 
E. A.
LeDoux
 
J. E.
Contributions of the amygdala to emotion processing: From animal models to human behavior
Neuron
2005
, vol. 
48
 (pg. 
175
-
187
)
166
Pickel
 
K. L.
Unusualness and threat as possible causes of “weapon focus”
Memory
1998
, vol. 
6
 (pg. 
277
-
295
)
167
Polanía
 
R.
Moisa
 
M.
Opitz
 
A.
Grueschow
 
M.
Ruff
 
C. C.
The precision of value-based choices depends causally on fronto-parietal phase coupling
Nature Communications
2015
, vol. 
6
 pg. 
8090
 
168
Pulvermüller
 
F.
Opinion: Brain mechanisms linking language and action
Nature Reviews Neuroscience
2005
, vol. 
6
 (pg. 
576
-
582
)
169
Qiao-Tasserit
 
E.
Garcia Quesada
 
M.
Antico
 
L.
Bavelier
 
D.
Vuilleumier
 
P.
Pichon
 
S.
Transient emotional events and individual affective traits affect emotion recognition in a perceptual decision-making task
PLOS ONE
2017
, vol. 
12
 pg. 
e0171375
 
170
Radel
 
R.
Clément-Guillotin
 
C.
Evidence of motivational influences in early visual perception
Psychological Science
2012
, vol. 
23
 (pg. 
232
-
234
)
171
Raymond
 
J. E.
O’Brien
 
J. L.
Selective visual attention and motivation
Psychological Science
2009
, vol. 
20
 (pg. 
981
-
988
)
172
Read
 
D.
Loewenstein
 
G.
Enduring pain for money: decisions based on the perception and memory of pain
Journal of Behavioral Decision Making
1999
, vol. 
12
 (pg. 
1
-
17
)
173
Redondo
 
R. L.
Kim
 
J.
Arons
 
A. L.
Ramirez
 
S.
Liu
 
X.
Tonegawa
 
S.
Bidirectional switch of the valence associated with a hippocampal contextual memory engram
Nature
2014
, vol. 
513
 (pg. 
426
-
430
)
174
Rogers
 
T. B.
Kuiper
 
N. A.
Kirker
 
W. S.
Self-reference and the encoding of personal information
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
1977
, vol. 
35
 (pg. 
677
-
688
)
175
Roper
 
Z. J. J.
Vecera
 
S. P.
Funny money: the attentional role of monetary feedback detached from expected value
Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics
2016
, vol. 
78
 (pg. 
2199
-
2212
)
176
Rosati
 
A. G.
Hare
 
B.
Reward currency modulates human risk preferences
Evolution and Human Behavior
2016
, vol. 
37
 (pg. 
159
-
168
)
177
Samanez Larkin
 
G. R.
Gibbs
 
S. E. B.
Khanna
 
K.
Nielsen
 
L.
Carstensen
 
L. L.
Knutson
 
B.
Anticipation of monetary gain but not loss in healthy older adults
Nature Neuroscience
2007
, vol. 
10
 (pg. 
787
-
791
)
178
Schmidt
 
L. J.
Belopolsky
 
A. V.
Theeuwes
 
J.
Attentional capture by signals of threat
Cognition and Emotion
2015
, vol. 
29
 (pg. 
687
-
694
)
179
Schultz
 
W.
Neuronal reward and decision signals: From theories to data
Physiological Reviews
2015
, vol. 
95
 (pg. 
853
-
951
)
180
Sescousse
 
G.
Barbalat
 
G.
Domenech
 
P.
Dreher
 
J.-C.
Imbalance in the sensitivity to different types of rewards in pathological gambling
Brain
2013a
, vol. 
136
 (pg. 
2527
-
2538
)
181
Sescousse
 
G.
Caldú
 
X.
Segura
 
B.
Dreher
 
J.-C.
Processing of primary and secondary rewards: A quantitative meta-analysis and review of human functional neuroimaging studies
Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews
2013b
, vol. 
37
 (pg. 
681
-
696
)
182
Sescousse
 
G.
Redoute
 
J.
Dreher
 
J.-C.
The architecture of reward value coding in the human orbitofrontal cortex
Journal of Neuroscience
2010
, vol. 
30
 (pg. 
13095
-
13104
)
183
Shafer
 
A. T.
Matveychuk
 
D.
Penney
 
T.
O’Hare
 
A. J.
Stokes
 
J.
Dolcos
 
F.
Processing of emotional distraction is both automatic and modulated by attention: Evidence from an event-related fMRI investigation
Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience
2012
, vol. 
24
 (pg. 
1233
-
1252
)
184
Shebani
 
Z.
Pulvermüller
 
F.
Moving the hands and feet specifically impairs working memory for arm- and leg-related action words
Cortex
2013
, vol. 
49
 (pg. 
222
-
231
)
185
Shigemune
 
Y.
Abe
 
N.
Suzuki
 
M.
Ueno
 
A.
Mori
 
E.
Tashiro
 
M.
Itoh
 
M.
Fujii
 
T.
Effects of emotion and reward motivation on neural correlates of episodic memory encoding: A PET study
Neuroscience Research
2010
, vol. 
67
 (pg. 
72
-
79
)
186
Shohamy
 
D.
Adcock
 
R. A.
Dopamine and adaptive memory
Trends in Cognitive Sciences
2010
, vol. 
14
 (pg. 
464
-
472
)
187
Skiba
 
R. M.
Snow
 
J. C.
Attentional capture for tool images is driven by the head end of the tool, not the handle
Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics
2016
, vol. 
78
 (pg. 
2500
-
2514
)
188
Skrynka
 
J.
Vincent
 
B.
Subjective hunger, not blood glucose, influences domain general time preference
PsyArXiv
2017
pg. 
qgp54
 
189
Snow
 
J. C.
Pettypiece
 
C. E.
McAdam
 
T. D.
McLean
 
A. D.
Stroman
 
P. W.
Goodale
 
M. A.
Culham
 
J. C.
Bringing the real world into the fMRI scanner: Repetition effects for pictures versus real objects
Scientific Reports
2011
, vol. 
1
 
190
Snow
 
J. C.
Skiba
 
R. M.
Coleman
 
T. L.
Berryhill
 
M. E.
Real-world objects are more memorable than photographs of objects
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
2014
, vol. 
8
 pg. 
837
 
191
Soderstrom
 
N. C.
McCabe
 
D. P.
Are survival processing memory advantages based on ancestral priorities?
Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
2011
, vol. 
18
 (pg. 
564
-
569
)
192
Spaniol
 
J.
Schain
 
C.
Bowen
 
H. J.
Reward-enhanced memory in younger and older adults
Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences
2013
, vol. 
69
 (pg. 
730
-
740
)
193
Squires
 
S. D.
Macdonald
 
S. N.
Culham
 
J. C.
Snow
 
J. C.
Priming tool actions: Are real objects more effective primes than pictures?
Experimental Brain Research
2016
, vol. 
234
 (pg. 
963
-
976
)
194
Steblay
 
N. M.
A meta-analytic review of the weapon focus effect
Law and Human Behavior
1992
, vol. 
16
 (pg. 
413
-
424
)
195
Strange
 
B. A.
Hurlemann
 
R.
Dolan
 
R. J.
An emotion-induced retrograde amnesia in humans is amygdala- and β- adrenergic-dependent
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2003
, vol. 
100
 (pg. 
13626
-
13631
)
196
Symons
 
C. S.
Johnson
 
B. T.
The self-reference effect in memory: A meta-analysis
Psychological Bulletin
1997
, vol. 
121
 (pg. 
371
-
394
)
197
Tacikowski
 
P.
Nowicka
 
A.
Allocation of attention to self-name and self-face: An ERP study
Biological Psychology
2010
, vol. 
84
 (pg. 
318
-
324
)
198
Talmi
 
D.
Enhanced emotional memory
Current Directions in Psychological Science
2013
, vol. 
22
 (pg. 
430
-
436
)
199
Talmi
 
D.
Dayan
 
P.
Kiebel
 
S. J.
Frith
 
C. D.
Dolan
 
R. J.
How humans integrate the prospects of pain and reward during choice
Journal of Neuroscience
2009
, vol. 
29
 (pg. 
14617
-
14626
)
200
Talmi
 
D.
Moscovitch
 
M.
Can semantic relatedness explain the enhancement of memory for emotional words?
Memory & Cognition
2004
, vol. 
32
 (pg. 
742
-
751
)
201
Talmi
 
D.
Ziegler
 
M.
Hawksworth
 
J.
Lalani
 
S.
Herman
 
C. P.
Moscovitch
 
M.
Emotional stimuli exert parallel effects on attention and memory
Cognition & Emotion
2013
, vol. 
27
 (pg. 
530
-
538
)
202
Taylor
 
S. E.
Asymmetrical effects of positive and negative events: The mobilization-minimization hypothesis
Psychological Bulletin
1991
, vol. 
110
 (pg. 
67
-
85
)
203
Tiedemann
 
L. J.
Schmid
 
S. M.
Hettel
 
J.
Giesen
 
K.
Francke
 
P.
Büchel
 
C.
Brassen
 
S.
Central insulin modulates food valuation via mesolimbic pathways
Nature Communications
2017
, vol. 
8
 pg. 
16052
 
204
Tousignant
 
C.
Pexman
 
P. M.
Flexible recruitment of semantic richness: context modulates body-object interaction effects in lexical-semantic processing
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
2012
, vol. 
6
 pg. 
53
 
205
Truong
 
G.
Chapman
 
C. S.
Chisholm
 
J. D.
Enns
 
J. T.
Handy
 
T. C.
Mine in motion: How physical actions impact the psychological sense of object ownership
Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance
2016
, vol. 
42
 (pg. 
375
-
385
)
206
Truong
 
G.
Roberts
 
K. H.
Todd
 
R. M.
I saw mine first: A prior-entry effect for newly acquired ownership
Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance
2017
, vol. 
43
 (pg. 
192
-
205
)
207
Tsetsos
 
K.
Chater
 
N.
Usher
 
M.
Salience driven value integration explains decision biases and preference reversal
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2012
, vol. 
109
 (pg. 
9659
-
9664
)
208
Tsukiura
 
T.
Cabeza
 
R.
Orbitofrontal and hippocampal contributions to memory for face–name associations: The rewarding power of a smile
Neuropsychologia
2008
, vol. 
46
 (pg. 
2310
-
2319
)
209
Tucker
 
M.
Ellis
 
R.
On the relations between seen objects and components of potential actions
Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance
1998
, vol. 
24
 (pg. 
830
-
846
)
210
Vlaev
 
I.
Seymour
 
B.
Chater
 
N.
Winston
 
J. S.
Yoshida
 
W.
Wright
 
N.
Symmonds
 
M.
Dolan
 
R.
Prices need no preferences: Social trends determine decisions in experimental markets for pain relief
Health Psychology
2014
, vol. 
33
 (pg. 
66
-
76
)
211
Vlaev
 
I.
Seymour
 
B.
Dolan
 
R. J.
Chater
 
N.
The price of pain and the value of suffering
Psychological Science
2009
, vol. 
20
 (pg. 
309
-
317
)
212
Vrijsen
 
J. N.
van Oostrom
 
I.
Speckens
 
A.
Becker
 
E. S.
Rinck
 
M.
Approach and avoidance of emotional faces in happy and sad mood
Cognitive Therapy and Research
2013
, vol. 
37
 (pg. 
1
-
6
)
213
Vuilleumier
 
P.
Schwartz
 
S.
Emotional facial expressions capture attention
Neurology
2001
, vol. 
56
 (pg. 
153
-
158
)
214
Wadlinger
 
H. A.
Isaacowitz
 
D. M.
Positive mood broadens visual attention to positive stimuli
Motivation and Emotion
2006
, vol. 
30
 (pg. 
87
-
99
)
215
Wagner
 
D. D.
Boswell
 
R. G.
Kelley
 
W. M.
Heatherton
 
T. F.
Inducing negative affect increases the reward value of appetizing foods in dieters
Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience
2012
, vol. 
24
 (pg. 
1625
-
1633
)
216
Wang
 
L.
Yu
 
H.
Zhou
 
X.
Interaction between value and perceptual salience in value-driven attentional capture
Journal of Vision
2013
, vol. 
13
 (pg. 
5
-
5
)
217
Weiner
 
B.
Walker
 
E. L.
Motivational factors in short-term retention
Journal of Experimental Psychology
1966
, vol. 
71
 (pg. 
190
-
193
)
218
Weinstein
 
Y.
Bugg
 
J. M.
Roediger
 
H. L.
Can the survival recall advantage be explained by basic memory processes?
Memory & Cognition
2008
, vol. 
36
 (pg. 
913
-
919
)
219
Wentura
 
D.
Rothermund
 
K.
Bak
 
P.
Automatic vigilance: The attention-grabbing power of approach- and avoidance-related social information
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
2000
, vol. 
78
 (pg. 
1024
-
1037
)
220
Williams
 
L. A.
DeSteno
 
D.
Pride and perseverance: The motivational role of pride
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
2008
, vol. 
94
 (pg. 
1007
-
1017
)
221
Wilson
 
A. D.
Golonka
 
S.
Embodied cognition is not what you think it is
Frontiers in Psychology
2013
, vol. 
4
 pg. 
58
 
222
Wispinski
 
N. J.
Truong
 
G.
Handy
 
T. C.
Chapman
 
C. S.
Reaching reveals that best-versus-rest processing contributes to biased decision making
Acta Psychologica
2017
, vol. 
176
 (pg. 
32
-
38
)
223
Witt
 
J. K.
Kemmerer
 
D.
Linkenauger
 
S. A.
Culham
 
J.
A functional role for motor simulation in identifying tools
Psychological Science
2010
, vol. 
21
 (pg. 
1215
-
1219
)
224
Wolpert
 
D. M.
Ghahramani
 
Z.
Flanagan
 
J.
Perspectives and problems in motor learning
Trends in Cognitive Sciences
2001
, vol. 
5
 (pg. 
487
-
494
)
225
Wood
 
N.
Cowan
 
N.
The cocktail party phenomenon revisited: How frequent are attention shifts to one’s name in an irrelevant auditory channel?
Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition
1995
, vol. 
21
 (pg. 
255
-
260
)
226
Woud
 
M. L.
Becker
 
E. S.
Lange
 
W.-G.
Rinck
 
M.
Effects of approach-avoidance training on implicit and explicit evaluations of neutral, angry, and smiling face stimuli
Psychological Reports
2013
, vol. 
113
 (pg. 
199
-
216
)
227
Xie
 
W.
Zhang
 
W.
Negative emotion boosts quality of visual working memory representation
Emotion
2016
, vol. 
16
 (pg. 
760
-
774
)
228
Xie
 
W.
Zhang
 
W.
Negative emotion enhances mnemonic precision and subjective feelings of remembering in visual long-term memory
Cognition
2017
, vol. 
166
 (pg. 
73
-
83
)
229
Yamawaki
 
R.
Nakamura
 
K.
Aso
 
T.
Shigemune
 
Y.
Fukuyama
 
H.
Tsukiura
 
T.
Remembering my friends: Medial prefrontal and hippocampal contributions to the self-reference effect on face memories in a social context
Human Brain Mapping
 
(in press)
230
Yee
 
D. M.
Krug
 
M. K.
Allen
 
A. Z.
Braver
 
T. S.
Humans integrate monetary and liquid incentives to motivate cognitive task performance
Frontiers in Psychology
2016
, vol. 
6
 pg. 
2037
 
231
Yoon
 
S.
Vo
 
K.
Venkatraman
 
V.
Variability in decision strategies across description-based and experience-based decision making
Journal of Behavioral Decision Making
2017
232
Zeigenfuse
 
M. D.
Pleskac
 
T. J.
Liu
 
T.
Rapid decisions from experience
Cognition
2014
, vol. 
131
 (pg. 
181
-
194
)
233
Zhou
 
X.
Gao
 
D.-G.
Social support and money as pain management mechanisms
Psychological Inquiry
2008
, vol. 
19
 (pg. 
127
-
144
)
234
Zimmerman
 
C. A.
Kelley
 
C. M.
‘I’ll remember this!’ effects of emotionality on memory predictions versus memory performance
Journal of Memory and Language
2010
, vol. 
62
 (pg. 
240
-
253
)
235
Zink
 
C. F.
Tong
 
Y.
Chen
 
Q.
Bassett
 
D. S.
Stein
 
J. L.
Meyer-Lindenberg
 
A.
Know your place: Neural processing of social hierarchy in humans
Neuron
2008
, vol. 
58
 (pg. 
273
-
283
)

Peer Review Comments

The author(s) of this paper chose the Open Review option, and the peer review comments are available at: http://doi.org/10.1525/collabra.111.pr

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. See http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.