Azmi Bishara assesses Israel in terms of the ancient regional precedent of the crusader state, where a foreign polity maintained its existence through military might and orchestrating intricate pacts with various local powers and Arab princes while sowing internecine dissent among them. The ‘two-state’ solution is, according to the author, one which is doomed to failure due not only to public opinion, political ambiguities and realities on the ground and practical issues, but also to the lack of genuine support. Aside from the concept of a bi-national state once advocated by Hashomer Hatzair in the 1930s, Israel has been unwilling to seriously entertain alternatives. The viable solution, which is unfortunately not taken seriously is the democratic, egalitarian, secular one-state solution—a solution which guarantees equal rights for Jews and Arabs, the right of return. Time, however, according to the author is running out—and the future solutions currently held out by Hamas or Israel are not democratic.
Skip Nav Destination
Research Article| April 01 2009
Israel's historic options
Contemporary Arab Affairs (2009) 2 (2): 240–251.
- Views Icon Views
- Share Icon Share
- Search Site
Azmi Bishara; Israel's historic options. Contemporary Arab Affairs 1 April 2009; 2 (2): 240–251. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/0790062080258861
Download citation file: