The thesis of political Islam’s failure reignites a deep discussion of fundamental questions. At the same time, it opens the door for a discussion of post Islamism as a concept, a term, and a phase. The term “post-Islamism,” like every “post-” term, is undoubtedly characterized by an extremely fluid definition. This leads to certain interpretations expiring without establishing others and to profound transformations occurring within an intellectual and social phenomenon that presages that it will evolve away from its original form. In no circumstance, however, will what comes after resemble what came before. The aspects of the relationship and similarity between the two phases largely remains relative and ambiguous. Although the use of the term “post-Islamism” dates back decades, in particular to the 1990s, it has once again returned to the spotlight, more prominently now than ever, as several Islamist movements are advancing further on the path to accepting democracy, political pluralism, and power-sharing. Several Islamist movements in the Arab and Islamic world today are embracing public and individual freedoms, and advocating a separation of religion and politics. This article examines the concept of post-Islamism, its legitimacy, and credibility as a fundamental shift in Islamist rhetoric and behavior, as well as the causes leading to it, and the conditions, obstacles, and realistic models of this concept or its approximates, both Sunni and Shiite, in the Arab or Muslim world.
Skip Nav Destination
Research Article| September 03 2019
Post-Islamism: Ideological Delusions and Sociological Realities
Contemporary Arab Affairs (2019) 12 (3): 3–20.
- Views Icon Views
- Share Icon Share
- Search Site
Abdul Ghani Imad; Post-Islamism: Ideological Delusions and Sociological Realities. Contemporary Arab Affairs 3 September 2019; 12 (3): 3–20. doi: https://doi.org/10.1525/caa.2019.123001
Download citation file: