This article establishes that politically motivated pursuit of criminal justice at the international level undermines trust in the international legal order and inflicts multilateral harm that goes far beyond the facts subject to judicial process. The author analyzes the pursuit of justice in relation to two major events: the murder of Rafiq Hariri, a former Lebanese prime minister, and the international crimes that Saddam Hussein, former president of Iraq, was accused of committing. In the first example, the author examines the role of the UN Security Council, including reference to the efforts of the US, relative to the investigation and establishment of a special tribunal for Lebanon; and in the second, the role of the US in the trial and execution of Saddam Hussein. Both cases demonstrate that justice is the main victim of politicizing the judicial process.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
October 2008
Research Article|
October 01 2008
The Hariri and Saddam tribunals: two expressions of tortured justice
Daoud Khairallah
Daoud Khairallah
Georgetown University Law Center, Washington, DC, USA
Search for other works by this author on:
Corresponding Address: Email: [email protected]; [email protected]
Contemporary Arab Affairs (2008) 1 (4): 589–611.
Citation
Daoud Khairallah; The Hariri and Saddam tribunals: two expressions of tortured justice. Contemporary Arab Affairs 1 October 2008; 1 (4): 589–611. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/17550910802391118
Download citation file:
Sign in
Don't already have an account? Register
Client Account
You could not be signed in. Please check your email address / username and password and try again.
Could not validate captcha. Please try again.