This article is not the first to examine the relationship of art and text in Heliodorus’s novel. But rather than reduce the text’s engagement with visual culture to the paragone of word and image, or to the conjuring of specific object after specific object, it asks what happens if we take seriously the piling in of different media from different periods and different places, emphasizing the shifting perspectival planes and modes of engagement that these demand of the reader/viewer. Revisiting some of the most frequently discussed passages of the novel, it shows how these harness the effects of this visual culture in ways that keep the reader/viewer engaged and enargeia “enactive.” This is of a piece, it argues, with a text that has been described as being “beyond interpretation” (Hunter 1998: 40–59 and Whitmarsh 2022: 4–5), a text that is self-conscious about following in Philostratus’s footsteps.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
Research Article|
April 01 2025
Beyond Representation: Art and Enargeia in Heliodorus’s Aethiopica*
Caroline Vout
*
This paper had its genesis in a conference organized by Claire Jackson and Benedek Kruchió. I thank them for their comments along with those who participated in their “Heliodorus in New Contexts” event, especially Albert Bates and Jonas Grethlein. I also thank Robin Osborne, Simon Goldhill, and my two anonymous readers. The paper is much improved by their engagement with it.
Classical Antiquity (2025) 44 (1): 150–182.
Citation
Caroline Vout; Beyond Representation: Art and Enargeia in Heliodorus’s Aethiopica. Classical Antiquity 7 May 2025; 44 (1): 150–182. doi: https://doi.org/10.1525/ca.2025.44.1.150
Download citation file:
Sign in
Don't already have an account? Register
Client Account
You could not be signed in. Please check your email address / username and password and try again.
Could not validate captcha. Please try again.