All parts of Heraclitus’ cosmos are simultaneously living and dying. Its constituent stuffs (“biomasses”) cycle endlessly through physical changes in sweeping patterns (“biorhythms”) that are reflected in the dynamic rhythms of Heraclitus’ own thought and language. These natural processes are best examined at a more-than-human level that exceeds individuation, stable identity, rational comprehension, and linguistic capture. B62 (“mortals immortals”), one of Heraclitus’ most perplexing fragments, models these processes in a spectacular fashion: it describes the imbrication not only of humans and gods but of cosmic masses more generally, and its language mimics the natural relations that it names, or rather intimates through its grammatical and syntactical indeterminacy. The remaining fragments amplify the uncertainties and the exhilarations of Heraclitus’ worldview along the same lines. His approach to nature raises urgent questions about how human beings fit into the cosmos, not least by challenging our intuitive conceptions of life and death, our material makeup, and our entanglements with our natural surroundings. In doing so, he provides vital lessons for contemporary ecological awareness, and proves to be an unexpected ally.
Life Cycles beyond the Human: Biomass and Biorhythms in Heraclitus*
A shorter version of this essay was presented at the conference “What is Life? Ancient Answers to Modern Questions,” organized by Martin Devecka at the University of California, Santa Cruz in February 2023. My thanks to Martin for the invitation and to the audience for lively discussion. A special thanks is owed to Mario Telò for encouraging me to expand the talk into an article for this journal. Further thanks go to two anonymous readers, André Laks, whose comment prompted me to clarify part of my argument, Eric Downing for discussion, and, for meticulous copy-editing and correction, Joshua Benjamins. The essay developed out of a work in progress titled Being beyond the Self: Nature and Community from Heraclitus to the Roman Stoics.
Abbreviations and numberings used for Heraclitus’ texts and translations follow those of two editions: Diels and Kranz 1951–1952, cited as “A1,” etc. for testimonia; “B1,” etc. for fragments (with “DK 22” understood); and Laks and Most 2016, vol. 3, cited as “P1,” etc. for biographica; “D1,” etc. for fragments; “R1,” etc. for reports (testimonia). Further abbreviations indicate translations. Capitalized Roman numerals refer to the numbering system used by Kahn 1979; “KRS” + Arabic numerals refer to that used by Kirk, Raven, and Schofield 1983. Unattributed translations are my own.
James I. Porter; Life Cycles beyond the Human: Biomass and Biorhythms in Heraclitus. Classical Antiquity 1 April 2024; 43 (1): 50–96. doi: https://doi.org/10.1525/ca.2024.43.1.50
Download citation file: