As an imperial Greek author of both cultural and stylistic interest, Aretaeus deserves to be more widely read. His most riveting disease descriptions bring before our eyes the spectacle of the human body in extreme states of suffering and dehumanization. These descriptions achieve a degree of visual immediacy and emotional impact unparalleled among ancient medical writers. This essay considers them as examples of ekphrastic rhetoric, designed to create enargeia. To intensify immediacy and impact, Aretaeus deploys a set of techniques that invite the reader’s active engagement with the spectacle he describes. This engagement has the potential to generate a corporeal response that destabilizes the boundary between the body of the reader and the body in the text. The modern concept of “empathy” is perhaps too anodyne to convey the complexity of the response involved.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
October 2020
Research Article|
December 22 2020
Aretaeus and the Ekphrasis of Agony
Maud Gleason
Classical Antiquity (2020) 39 (2): 153–187.
Citation
Maud Gleason; Aretaeus and the Ekphrasis of Agony. Classical Antiquity 22 December 2020; 39 (2): 153–187. doi: https://doi.org/10.1525/ca.2020.39.2.153
Download citation file:
Sign in
Don't already have an account? Register
Client Account
You could not be signed in. Please check your email address / username and password and try again.
Could not validate captcha. Please try again.