This paper compares the cases of female ailments recorded in the Epidaurian Miracles Cures (iamata) with the theory and therapeutics of the Hippocratic gynecological texts as a means of testing the extent of the assumptions shared between temple and Hippocratic medicine. I argue that where temple and Hippocratic practice hold common ground, it is readily explicable through widely circulating and historically rooted cultural presuppositions regarding female physiology and pathology, rather than through scientific borrowings. Rather than representing complementary outlets of medical care in which Asklepios specialized in “hopeless” cases, I suggest that the iamata permit us to observe a process in which parallel medical traditions branched out from a common cultural substratum, and that more nuance is required in framing the relationship between Greek naturalist and religious medicine.
Skip Nav Destination
Research Article| October 01 2018
Gender in the Temple: Women's Ailments in the Epidaurian Miracle Cures
New York University, firstname.lastname@example.org
Search for other works by this author on:
Classical Antiquity (2018) 37 (2): 321–350.
Calloway Scott; Gender in the Temple: Women's Ailments in the Epidaurian Miracle Cures. Classical Antiquity 1 October 2018; 37 (2): 321–350. doi: https://doi.org/10.1525/ca.2018.37.2.321
Download citation file:
Don't already have an account? Register
You could not be signed in. Please check your email address / username and password and try again.
Could not validate captcha. Please try again.