The adoption of the codex for literature in the Roman world was one of the most significant developments in the history of the book, yet remains poorly understood. Physical evidence seems to contradict literary evidence from Martial's epigrams. Near-total adoption of the codex for early Christian works, even as the book roll dominated non-Christian book forms in the first centuries of our era, has led to endless speculation about possible ideological motives for adoption. What has been unquestioned is the importance of Christian scribes in the surge of adoption from 300 C.E. onward. This article reexamines the foundation of many theories, the timeline for non-Christian adoption sketched by Roberts and Skeat in their study, The Birth of the Codex, and reevaluates it through the lens of “diffusion of innovations theory” in order to reconcile the evidence and elevate practical considerations once and for all over ideological motives.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
October 2017
Research Article|
October 01 2017
The Diffusion of the Codex
Benjamin Harnett
Classical Antiquity (2017) 36 (2): 183–235.
Citation
Benjamin Harnett; The Diffusion of the Codex. Classical Antiquity 1 October 2017; 36 (2): 183–235. doi: https://doi.org/10.1525/ca.2017.36.2.183
Download citation file:
Sign in
Don't already have an account? Register
Client Account
You could not be signed in. Please check your email address / username and password and try again.
Could not validate captcha. Please try again.