AbstractThis study makes a pair with the author's ““Framing the Gift: The Politics of the Siphnian Treasury at Delphi,”” Classical Antiquity 20 (2001): 273––336. Like that essay, it argues that the function of a treasury is to provide a civic frame for ostentatious dedications by wealthy citizens: in effect, to ““nationalize”” votives. In this sense, the Athenian Treasury is a material trace, or fossil, of city politics in the 480s. The article tracks this function through the monument's iconography; its use of marble from the medizing island of Paros; its relation to the ““Alkmeonid”” temple of Apollo; and the responses it evoked at Delphi and in Athens. Special attention is given to the methodological problem of finding meaning in non-iconic or non-representational features, such as building materials. The article concludes with a new reading of Pindar's sixth Pythian, for Megakles of Athens, which neatly encapsulates what was at stake in this building project.

This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.