This article is about the legacy of William Mulholland, engineer of the Los Angeles Aqueduct who was instrumental in building public support for funding and building the project. Supporters hail him as a masterful campaigner and visionary without whom Los Angeles could not have developed into a major city; detractors accuse him of swindling farmers in the Owens Valley out of money and water rights and a puppet of powerful real estate interests in Los Angeles who lied to the public to get voters to support the aqueduct.
Villain and Visionary: Why we can’t agree on William Mulholland
Eve Bachrachis a writer, communications specialist, and assistant editor of Boom. She has worked for the Los Angeles Review of Books, Curbed LA, Oxford University Press, and the British antipoverty organization War on Want.
- Views Icon Views
- PDF LinkPDF
- Share Icon Share
- Search Site
Eve Bachrach; Villain and Visionary: Why we can’t agree on William Mulholland. Boom 1 September 2013; 3 (3): 8–10. doi: https://doi.org/10.1525/boom.2013.3.3.8
Download citation file: