Figure 1. Evolution of Taiwanese–Chinese Identity, 1994 to 2019 Source: Election Study Center, National Chengchi University, “Trends of Core Political Attitudes” ( https://esc.nccu.edu.tw/PageDoc/Detail?fid=7800&id=6961 ). More about this image found in Evolution of Taiwanese–Chinese Identity, 1994 to 2019 Source: Election S...

Figure 2. Volume of Internet Messages on YouTube related to the Anti-ELAB Movement, 2019 Source: Huang, Kuo, and Hung (2021 , 215). More about this image found in Volume of Internet Messages on YouTube related to the Anti-ELAB Movement, 2...

Figure 3. Incursions of Taiwan’s Air Defense Identification Zone by Chinese (People’s Liberation Army) Aircraft, November 2017 to September 2021 Sources: Ou and Huang (2018 , 2019 ); Hung and Lee (2020) . More about this image found in Incursions of Taiwan’s Air Defense Identification Zone by Chinese (People’s...

Figure 4. Predicted Probability of Taiwanese Citizens’ Identity Change, 2018–2020 More about this image found in Predicted Probability of Taiwanese Citizens’ Identity Change, 2018–2020

Figure 1. Operationalization of Securitization, Trust, and Smart Technologies More about this image found in Operationalization of Securitization, Trust, and Smart Technologies

Figure 2. Trust/Distrust in and Satisfaction/Dissatisfaction with the Hong Kong Government, February 2020 to July 2021 More about this image found in Trust/Distrust in and Satisfaction/Dissatisfaction with the Hong Kong Gover...

Figure 3. Citizens’ Opinions on Smart Technology More about this image found in Citizens’ Opinions on Smart Technology

Figure 1. Taiwanese Citizens’ Confidence in America’s Security Commitment, by Unification–Independence Position, 2003–20 Data source: Taiwan National Security Survey, 2003–20. More about this image found in Taiwanese Citizens’ Confidence in America’s Security Commitment, by Unifica...

Figure 2. Predicted Probability of Confidence Level: Pro-Independence Citizens versus Other Citizens More about this image found in Predicted Probability of Confidence Level: Pro-Independence Citizens versus...

Figure 1. DPJ Voters’ Reasons for Voting for the DPJ Note: The 2012 and 2017 elections are not shown because the surveys in those years did not include the question. Total numbers of valid responses are shown in Table 2 . SMD = single-member district; PR = proportional representation. More about this image found in DPJ Voters’ Reasons for Voting for the DPJ Note: The 2012 and 2017 electio...

Figure 2. Respondents’ Opinions on Whether the DPJ/CDP Can Govern the Country Note: Total numbers of respondents who voted for the DPJ (Democratic Party of Japan) or CDP (Constitutional Democratic Party) are 556 (2003), 403 (2005), 712 (2009), 509 (2012), 340 (2014), and 231 (2017). More about this image found in Respondents’ Opinions on Whether the DPJ/CDP Can Govern the Country Note: ...