Article 9 of Japan’s constitution renounces war and allows the use of military force only in self-defense. Thus, Japan can neither use the growing number of cyber tools available to other state actors, nor can it fully adopt the same threat-based approach to its national security narrative. This article addresses a gap in the literature by examining the case of a state that possesses technology, resources, and capabilities but is unable to adopt a threat-based security logic. Using discourse and content analysis methods, I show how Japan has constructed its cybersecurity narrative within a risk-based security framework. I also trace the changes that Japan’s cybersecurity narrative has undergone and explain how cyber risks and narrative constraints have influenced the cyber policymaking process in Japan.

You do not currently have access to this content.