Soft power, the idea that states can achieve their goals through attraction rather than coercion, has been applied to various contexts, leading to significant concept creep. Still, it remains appealing as a way to describe state behavior beyond military and economic factors. This article proposes a model that returns to the core of soft power, which involves both a positive affective response (“sentiment”) and an explicit political goal (“politicality”). This model clarifies the concept of soft power and offers a practical framework for both policymakers and scholars. We test our model by analyzing the reception of a South Korean government initiative: the 2021 visit to the UN General Assembly by former president Moon Jae-in and BTS. Sentiment analysis and topic modeling of 116,758 YouTube comments reveal strong positive sentiment but limited engagement with the political message. These findings challenge assumptions about soft power and have implications for foreign policy.
Toward a Political Model of Soft Power: An Empirical Evaluation of South Korean Foreign Policy Available to Purchase
Jenna Gibson is a PhD candidate in the Department of Political Science at the University of Chicago, IL, USA, in the subfield of International Relations. Her research interests include foreign policy rhetoric, public and cultural diplomacy, South Korean politics and social issues, and US–Korea relations.
Felicia Istad is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Public Administration at Korea University, Seoul. Her research examines foreign and domestic policies, covering topics such as diplomacy, migration, welfare, labor, and education.
Jenna Gibson, Felicia Istad; Toward a Political Model of Soft Power: An Empirical Evaluation of South Korean Foreign Policy. Asian Survey 1 June 2025; 65 (3): 459–495. doi: https://doi.org/10.1525/as.2025.2470882
Download citation file: