Given their citizens’ religiosity, the presence of religious parties, and the salience of religion in the politics of India and Pakistan, it is likely that politicians in both of these countries vary considerably in how religious they are. How do these differences influence their political and policy choices? We know surprisingly little about this question. This paper uses data from survey experiments fielded to politicians in India (in 2019) and Pakistan (in 2018) to examine how religiosity is correlated with politicians’ risk-taking behaviors. Given that research finds they are correlated in citizens and the ubiquity of both risk and religion in politics, understanding this relationship is important. The experimental data reveal that in both countries highly religious and less religious politicians make very different choices on a risky policy decision. Highly religious politicians are risk-seeking in India but risk-averse in Pakistan. While the less religious politicians approximate rational actors, the highly religious politicians violate both rational actor and prospect theory decision-making models.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
July/August 2023
Research Article|
May 09 2023
Religiosity and Risk among Politicians: Evidence from Pakistan and India
Vineeta Yadav
Vineeta Yadav is Associate Professor of Political Science at Pennsylvania State University, University Park, USA. Her most recent book, Religious Parties and the Politics of Civil Liberties (Oxford University Press, 2021), which includes an analysis of Pakistan, was awarded the 2022 Stein Rokkan Prize for Comparative Social Science Research. The data, code and online appendix for this article can be found on Harvard Dataverse and the author’s website (https://sites.psu.edu/vineetayadav/).
Email: <[email protected]>.
Search for other works by this author on:
Email: <[email protected]>.
Asian Survey (2023) 63 (4): 527–556.
Citation
Vineeta Yadav; Religiosity and Risk among Politicians: Evidence from Pakistan and India. Asian Survey 1 August 2023; 63 (4): 527–556. doi: https://doi.org/10.1525/as.2023.1824772
Download citation file:
Sign in
Don't already have an account? Register
Client Account
You could not be signed in. Please check your email address / username and password and try again.
Could not validate captcha. Please try again.