Representation is always a dynamic relation, a tatonnement, in which the represented adjust their preferences on the basis of beliefs induced by the representatives. All rulers—those selected in clean elections, those who hold such ceremonies without putting their power at stake, and those who do not even bother to hold them—claim to have reasons to be followed, and people are willing to follow them if they believe these are good reasons. Thus, individual preferences, “wills,”are influenced by the relation of representation. The controversial issue is whether the relation of representation can be assessed when preferences are endogenous, in particular when people are not exposed to a plurality of reasons.
Skip Nav Destination
Research Article| April 07 2020
Authoritarianism, Authority, and Representation
Adam Przeworski is a Professor in the Department of Politics, New York University. This is a revised version of a paper presented at the conference Rethinking Political Representation in China and Global Context, Hangzhou, China, March 22–24, 2019. Email: <email@example.com>.
Search for other works by this author on:
Asian Survey (2020) 60 (2): 347–365.
- Views Icon Views
- Share Icon Share
- Search Site
Adam Przeworski; Authoritarianism, Authority, and Representation. Asian Survey 7 April 2020; 60 (2): 347–365. doi: https://doi.org/10.1525/as.2020.60.2.347
Download citation file: