Any discussion of climate change, ecological crisis, or the Anthropocene entails an understanding of the differential experiences of life on a rapidly altered planet. Much of popular eco art focuses sharply on the representation of data, and on visualizing the perspectives of nonhumans. Such strategies, while doing the political work of raising awareness and generating necessary interspecies connections, continue to maintain a troubling neutrality toward human inequality and the nuances of identity. Even when grappling with what Rob Nixon has termed “slow violence” against the global poor,1 much politically oriented eco art nonetheless frames climate refugees and those affected by environmental crisis as victims, inherently other to the audience.2 In what follows, I analyze the depiction of toxicity in the work of Indian artist Vibha Galhotra, and argue that reorienting our frame of analysis to privilege a non-Western subaltern reading of the work provides key insights into approaching...
Troubling the Waters of Neutrality: Eco Art as an Identity Proposition
Ila Sheren is an associate professor of art history in the Department of Art History and Archaeology at Washington University in St. Louis. She is the author of Portable Borders: Performance Art and Politics on the U.S. Frontera since 1984 (2015).
- Views Icon Views
- Share Icon Share
- Search Site
Ila Sheren; Troubling the Waters of Neutrality: Eco Art as an Identity Proposition. Afterimage 1 June 2020; 47 (2): 28–34. doi: https://doi.org/10.1525/aft.2020.472006
Download citation file: