References

Briscoe, S. & Aldersey-Williams, H. (2008). Panicology. New York, NY: Viking Press.
Carmines, E. & Stimson, J. (1980). The two faces of issue voting. American Political Science Review, 74(1), 78-91.
Chong, D. & Druckman, J. N. (2007a). Framing theory. Annual Review of Political Science, 10, 103-126.
Chong, D. & Druckman, J. N. (2007b). A theory of framing and opinion formation in competitive elite environments. Journal of Communication, 57(4), 99-118.
DeBoer, G. E. (2000). Scientific literacy: Another look at its historical and contem- porary meanings and its relationship to science education reform. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37, 582-601.
Druckman, J. (2004). Political preference formation: Competition, deliberation, and the (Ir)relevance of framing effects. American Political Science Review, 98(4), 671-686.
Entman, R. (1993). Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication, 43(4), 51-58.
Guill, J. M. (2006). A written media-review project that reinforces introductory biology topics & promotes critical thinking. The American Biology Teacher, 68(6), 365-367.
Jarman, R. & McClune, B. (2007). Developing scientific literacy: Using news media in the classroom. New York, NY: Open University Press.
Laugksch, R. C. (2000). Scientific literacy: A conceptual overview. Science Education, 84, 71-94.
MacDonald, G. J. (2008, August 12). Are we science-savvy enough to make informed decisions? USA Today.
MacKenzie, A. H. (2007). Assessing biology information in today's world: Are our students capable? The American Biology Teacher, 69(7), 390-392.
National Research Council. (1996). National Science Education Standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
National Science Foundation. (2006). Science and technology: Public attitudes and understandings. In NSF Science and Engineering Indicators 2006. Retrieved, February 27th, 2008. http://www.nsf.gov/statistics/sein06/c7/cth.htm.
Nelson, T. E., Oxley, Z. M. & Clawson, R. (1997). Toward a psychology of framing effects. Political Behavior, 19(3), 221-246.
Nisbet, M. C. & Scheufeie, D. A. (2007). The future of public engagement. The Scientist, 21(10), 39-44.
Oulton, C., Dillon, J. & Grace, M. M. (2004). Reconceptualizing the teaching of con- troversial issues. International Journal of Science Education, 26(4), 411-423.
Seethaler, S. (2005). Helping students make links through science controversy. The American Biology Teacher, 67(5), 283-289.
Slovic, P. (1993). Perceived risk, trust, and democracy. Risk Analysis, 13(6), 675- 682.
Spies, S. (2008, February 16). Abortion remarks angers students. The Raleigh News & Observer, p. 1B, 11B.
This content is only available via PDF.

Article PDF first page preview

Article PDF first page preview