References

Abrams, E., Southerland, S. A. & Silva, P. (Eds.). (2008). Inquiry in the Classroom: Realities and Opportunities. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.
Buck, L. B., Bretz, S. L. & Towns, M. H. (2008). Characterizing the level of Inquiry in the under- graduate laboratory. Journal of College Science Teaching, 38(1), 52-58.
Frledrichsen, P. J. (2008). A conversation with Sandra Abel I: Science teacher learning. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 4(1), 71-79
Inquiry (continued). (2008). The Science Education Review, 7, 27-36.
Inquiry learning: A discussion. (2007-2008). Available online at http://www.scienceeducationreview. com/open_access/index.html.
Johnson, M. & Smith. M. (2008). Designing appropriate scaffolding for student science projects Journal of College Science Teaching 38(2), 24-29.
MacKenzie, A. H. (2008a). The necessity of students & teachers as science researchers. The American Biology Teacher, 70(9), 518.
MacKenzie, A. H. (2008b). WaitingforGodot: A remind- er of the young adult learning experience. The American Biology Teacher, 70(8), 455.
National Research Council. (2000). Inquiry and the National Science Education Standards: A Guide for Teaching and Learning. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
Schwebach, J. R. (2008). Science seminar: Science cap- stone research projects as a class in high school. The American Biology Teacher, 70(8), 488-497.
Settlage, J. (2007). Demythologizing science teacher education: Conquering the false ideal of open inquiry. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 18, 461-467.
Yager, R. (1988). Never playing the game. The Science Teacher, 55(9), 77.
Abd-El-Khalick, F., Boujaoude, S., Duschl, R., Lederman, N. G., Mamlok-Naaman, R., Hofstein, A. et al. (2004). Inquiry in science education: International perspectives. Science Education, 88(3), 397-419.
Bencze, L., & Hodson, D. (1999). Changing practice by changing practice: Toward more authentic science and science curriculum development. Journal of Research In Science Teaching, 36, 521- 539.
Chang, C.Y. & Barufaldi, J.P. (1997). Initiating change in students' achievement and alternative frame- works through a problem solving based instruc- tional model: Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, Chicago, IL, March 21-24.
Glasson, G.E. (1989). The effects of hands-on and teacher demonstration laboratory methods on science achievement in relation to reasoning ability and prior knowledge.Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 26, 121-131.
Johnson, M. A. & Lawson, E. (1998). What are the rela- tive effects of reasoning ability and prior knowl- edge on biology achievement in expository and inquiry classes? Journal of Research In Science Teaching, 35(l), 89-103.
Krystynlak, R. A. & Helkkinen, W. (2007). Analysis of verbal interactions during an extended, open- inquiry general chemistry laboratory investiga- tion. Journal of Research In Science Teaching, 44(8), 1160-1186.
McBrlde, J. W., Bhattl, M. I., Hannan, M. A. & Felnberg, M. (2004). Using an inquiry approach to teach science to secondary school science teachers. Physics Education, 39(5), 434-439.
National Research Council. (1996). National Science Education Standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
National Research Council. (2000). Inquiry and The National Science Education Standards: A Guide for Teaching and Learning. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
Settlage, J. (2007). Demythologizing science teacher education: Conquering the false ideal of open Inquiry. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 10(4), 461-467.
Taraban, R., Box, C., Myers, R., Pollard, R. & Bowen, C. W. (2007). Effects of active-learning experiences on achievement, attitudes, and behaviors in high school biology. Journal of Research In Science Teaching, 44(7), 960 - 979.
This content is only available via PDF.

Article PDF first page preview

Article PDF first page preview