References

Berenson, S.B., Carter, G. & Norwood, KS. (1992). The at-risk student in college developmental algebra. School Science and Mathematics, 92(2), 55-58.
Caron, M.D., Whitbourne, S.K. & Halgin, R.P. (1992). Fraudulent excuse making among college students. Teaching of Psychology, 19(2), 90-93.
Friedman, P., Rodriguez, F. & McComb, J. (2001). Why students do and do not attend classes. College Teaching, 49(4), 124-133.
Grisé, DJ. & Kenney, A.M. (2003). Nonmajors' performance in biology. Journal of College Science Teaching, 33(2), 18-21.
Hammen, C.S. & Kelland, J.L. (1994). Attendance and grades in a human physiology course. The American Journal of Physiology, 267(6), S105- 108.
Hatfield, J. (2003). Office of Research and Evaluation - Research 2002-2003. Minneapolis, MN: General College, University of Minnesota.
Higbee, J.L., Lundell, D.B. & Arendale, D. (2005). The General College Vision: Integrating Intellectual Growth, Multicultural Perspectives, and Student Development. Minneapolis, MN: Center for Research on Developmental Education and Urban Literacy, University of Minnesota.
Jensen, P.A. & Moore, R. (In Press). Do students' grades in high school biology accurately predict their grades in college biology? Journal of College Science Teaching.
Launius, M.H. (1997). College student attendance: Attitudes and academic performance. College Student Journal, 31, 86-92.
Moore, R. (2003). Students' choices in developmental education: Is it really important to attend class? Research and Teaching in Developmental Education, 20(1), 42-52.
Moore, R. (2004). Helping students succeed in introductory science courses: How valid are students' claims about their course-related behaviors? Journal of College Science Teaching, 33(4), 14-17.
Moore, R. (2005). Who does extra-credit work in introductory science courses? Journal of College of Science Teaching, 34(7), 12-15.
Moore, R. (2006). Do introductory science courses select for effort or aptitude? In J.L. Mintzes and W.H. Leonard (Eds.), Handbook of College Science Teaching (pp. 137-154). Arlington, VA: National Science Teachers Association.
Moore, R. (2007). Diverse behaviors, diverse results: A motivation- based model for students' academic outcomes. In J.L. Higbee, D.B. Lundell, and I.M. Duranczyk (Eds.), Diversity and the Postsecondary Experience (pp. 129-143). Minneapolis, MN: Center for Research on Developmental Education and Urban Literacy, College of Education and Human Development, University of Minnesota.
Pintrich, P.R. & Garcia, T. (1994). Self-regulated learning in college students: Knowledge, strategies and motivation. In P.R. Pintrich & D.R. Brown (Eds.), Student Motivation, Cognition and Learning: Essays in Honor of Wilbur J. McKeachie (pp. 113-133). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Rooney, M. (2003, January 31). Freshmen show rising political awareness and changing social views. Chronicle of Higher Education, pp. A35-38.
Sanoff, A.P. (2005, May 9). Survey: High School fails to engage students. USA Today, p. 5D.
Sappington, J., Kinsey, K. & Munsayac, K. (2002). Two studies of reading com- pliance among college students. Teaching of Psychology, 29, 272-274.
Sokal, R.R. & Rohlf, FJ. (2005). Biometry. San Francisco: W.H. Freeman.
St. Clair, K.L. (1999). A case against compulsory class attendance policies in higher education. Innovative Higher Education, 23(3), 171-180.
Thomas, P.V. & Higbee, J.L. (2000). The relationship between involvement and success in developmental algebra. Journal of College Reading and Learning, 30(2), 222-232.
Thompson, M.E. & Plummer, B.C. (1979). Remedial college freshmen English students: Description and characteristics. Reading Horizons, 19(3), 248-255.
Viadero, D. (2005). Studies show high schools' shortcomings. Education Week, 24(22), pp. 1, 12.
Wambach, C.A. (1993). Motivational themes and academic success of at- risk freshmen. Journal of Developmental Education, 16(3), 8-10, 12, 37.
Yaworski, J., Weber, R.M. & Ibrahim, N. (2000). What makes students suc- ceed or fail?: The voices of developmental college students. Journal of College Reading and Learning, 30(2), 195-221.
This content is only available via PDF.

Article PDF first page preview

Article PDF first page preview