References

References
Balcombe,J.P. (2000). The Use of Aninmals in Higher Education: Problems: Alternatives and Recommendations. Washington, DC: Humane Society Press. Available at http://hsus.org/ ace/ 13059.
Balcombe
The Use of Aninmals in Higher Education: Problems: Alternatives and Recommendations
2000
Balcombe, J.P. (2001). Dissection: The scientific case for alternatives. Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science, 4, 118-126.
Balcombe
118
4
Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science
2001
Cross, T. & Cross, V. (2004). Scalpel or mouse? A statistical comparison of real & virtual frog dissections. The American Biology Teacher; 66, 408-411.
Cross
408
66
The American Biology Teacher
2004
Nobis, N. (2004). Carl Cohen's "kind" arguments fo- animal rights and against human rights. Journal of Applied Philosophy, 21(1), 43-59.
Nobis
1
43
21
Journal of Applied Philosophy
2004
Nobis, N. (2002). Animal dissection and evidence-based life science & health professions education. Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science, 5(2), pp. 155-159.
Nobis
2
155
5
Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science
2002
Regan, T. (2004). Empty Cages: Facing the Challenge of Animal Rights. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
Regan
Empty Cages: Facing the Challenge of Animal Rights
2004
Taylor, A. (2003). Animals & Ethics: An Overview of the Philosophical Debate. Orchard Park, NY: Broadview Press.
Taylor
Animals & Ethics: An Overview of the Philosophical Debate
2003
This content is only available via PDF.

Article PDF first page preview

Article PDF first page preview