References

References
American Association for the Advancement of Science. (2002). Science Policy: AAAS Report Calls for Oversight of Inheritable Gene Research. Available online at: http://www. aaas.org/news/newsandnotes/inside64.shtml.
Center for Genetics and Society. (2002). Human Genetics in the Public Interest. Available online at: http://www. genetics-and-society.org.
Coutts, M. C. (1991). Human Gene Therapy. National Reference Center for Bioethics Literature. Available online at: http://www.csu.edu.au/learning/ncgr/gpi/grn/edures/ scope.24.html.
Deneen, S. (2001). The human genetic blueprint has been draft- ed, offering both perils and opportunities for the environ- ment. The big question: Are we changing the nature of nature? Emagazine.com, 12 (1). Available online at: http://www.emagazine.com/january-february_2001 l0101 feat 1.html.
Deneen
1
12
Emagazine.com
2001
Exploratory Initiative on the New Human Genetic Technologies. (2000). Today, Genetically Modified Food, Tomorrow, Genetically Modified Humans? Human Genetic Engineering as a Critical Issue for Environmentalists. Available online at: http://www.mindfully.org/GE/Today-Food- Tomorrow-Humans.htm.
Friedmann, T. (1999). The Development of Human Gene Therapy. Cold Springs Harbor, NY: Cold Springs Laboratory Press.
Friedmann
The Development of Human Gene Therapy
1999
Hayes, R. (2000). In the pipeline: Genetically modified humans? Multinational Monitor, 21 (1&2). Available online at: http://ratical.org/co-globalize/mmGMhumans.html.
Hayes
1
21
Multinational Monitor
2000
Human Genetics Alert (2002). Campaigning for Democratic Control of Genetics. Available online at: http://www.hgalert. org/topics/hge/justin.htm.
Jiménez-Aleixandre, M. P., Rodriguez, A. B., & Duschl, R. A. (2000). "Doing the lesson" or "doing science": Argument in high school genetics. Science Education, 84, 757-792.
Jiménez-Aleixandre
757
84
Science Education
2000
Kolstø, S. D. (2001). Scientific literacy for citizenship: Tools for dealing with the science dimension of controversial socio- scientific issues. Science Education, 85, 291-310.
Kolstø
291
85
Science Education
2001
Mueller, R. F., & Young, I. D. (2001). Emery's Elements of Medical Genetics. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone.
Mueller
Emery's Elements of Medical Genetics
2001
Newman, S. A. (1999). Don't Try To Engineer Human Embryos. Council for Responsible Genetics. Available online at: http://www.gene-watch.org/programs/cloning/don't -engineer.html.
Pedretti. (1999). Decision making and STS education: Exploring scientific knowledge and social responsibility in schools and science centers through an issues-based approach. School Science and Mathematics, 99, 174-181.
Pedretti
174
99
School Science and Mathematics
1999
Sadler, T. D., & Zeidler, D. L. (2004). The morality of sociosci- entific issues: Construal and resolution of genetic engi- neering dilemmas. Science Education.
Silver, L. M. (1998). Remaking Eden: How Genetic Engineering and Cloning Will Transform the American Family. New York: Avon.
Silver
Remaking Eden: How Genetic Engineering and Cloning Will Transform the American Family
1998
National Research Council. (1996). National Science Education Standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
National Research Council
National Science Education Standards
1996
The National Genetics Society Online. (2000). The Therapy Report. Available online at: http://www.natgensociety. org/therapy2.htm.
Zeidler, D. L. (2003). The Role of Moral Reasoning and Discourse on Socioscientific Issues in Science Education. Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Press.
Zeidler
The Role of Moral Reasoning and Discourse on Socioscientific Issues in Science Education
2003
This content is only available via PDF.

Article PDF first page preview

Article PDF first page preview