References

References
Anthony, S., Mernitz, H., Spencer, B., Gutwill,J., Kegley, S. & Molinaro, M. (1998). The ChemLinks and ModularCHEM Consortia: Using active and context- based learning to teach students how chemistry is actually done. Journal of Chemical Education, 75(3), 322-324.
Anthony
3
322
75
Journal of Chemical Education
1998
Chiappetta, E.L. (1997). Inquiry based science: Strategies and techniques for encouraging inquiry in the classroom. The Science Teacher, October, 22-26.
Chiappetta
October
22
The Science Teacher
1997
Christianson, R.G. & Fisher, K.M. (1999). Comparison of student learning about diffusion and osmosis in constructivist and traditional classrooms. International Journal of Science Education, 21(6), 687-698.
Christianson
6
687
21
International Journal of Science Education
1999
Favero, T. (1998). Double dipping for research: An introduction to the scientific method. The American Biology Teacher, 60(7), 524-525.
Favero
7
524
60
The American Biology Teacher
1998
George, M.D., Bragg, S., de los Santos Jr., A.G., Denton, D.D., Gerber, P., Lindquist, M.M., Rosser, J.M., Sanchez, D.A. & Meyers, L. (1996). Shaping the Future: New Expectations for Undergraduate Education in Science, Mathematics, Engineering, and Technology. Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation.
George
Shaping the Future: New Expectations for Undergraduate Education in Science, Mathematics, Engineering, and Technology
1996
Goodwin, L., Miller, J.E. & Cheetham, R.D. (1991). Teaching freshmen to think - Does active learning work? BioScience, 41(10), 719-722.10.2307/1311767
719
Johnson, M.P. (1998). Learning about cellular respiration: An active approach illus- trating the process of scientific inquiry. The American Biology Teacher, 60(9), 685-689.
Johnson
9
685
60
The American Biology Teacher
1998
Klapper, M.H. (1995). Beyond the scientific method: Should science be taught as a more creative process? The Science Teacher, September, 36-40.
Klapper
September
36
The Science Teacher
1995
Moore, C.B., Abella, I.D., Abraham, N.B., Boggs, G., Denton, D.D., Doyle, M.P., Fox, M.A, Gabel, D.L., Gangolli, R., Graybeal, F.T., Hackerman, N., Haynes, J.K., Johann, E.D., Kirwan, WE., Kuerbis, PJ., Long, S., Merritts, DJ., Moore, J.A., Moore, P.P., Reynolds, WA., Serum, J.W. & Wilkinson, D.T. (1997). Science Teaching Reconsidered: A Handbook. Washington DC: National Academic Press.
Moore
Science Teaching Reconsidered: A Handbook
1997
Newcomb, L. (1977). Newcomb's Wildflower Guide. Boston: Little, Brown and Company.
Newcomb
Newcomb's Wildflower Guide
1977
Spuches, C.M. & Coufal, J.E. (2000). Focusing on process to improve learning: a case study of instructional research and development. Innovative Higher Education, 24(3), 183-202.
Spuches
3
183
24
Innovative Higher Education
2000
Stadler, M.A. (1998). Demonstrating scientific reasoning. Teaching of Psychology, 25(3), 205-206.
Stadler
3
205
25
Teaching of Psychology
1998
Sterner, R.T. (1998). The scientific method: An instructor's flow chart. The American Biology Teacher, 60(5), 374-378.
Sterner
5
374
60
The American Biology Teacher
1998
Williamson, R. & Smoak, E. (1999). Creating a down-to-earth approach to teaching science, math, and technology. Journal of Extension, 37(3), http:/jjoe.org/joe/ 1999june/iw3.html.
Williamson
3
37
Journal of Extension
1999
This content is only available via PDF.

Article PDF first page preview

Article PDF first page preview