1
Heard 1982
2
Gilkey 1985
3
Taylor & Condit 1988
5
Nelkin 1982
Irons 1988
Eve & Harrold 1991
Irons 1988
Nelkin 1982
6
Moore 1999b
7
Moyer said, "The law is going to be laughed at. Good teachers will realize they have an obligation to the subject matter... [Act 590] places the state in the position of defining by law what is truth in science" (Educators criticize creationism bill 1981).
8
Gilkey 1985
9
0verton's McLean v. Arkansas Board of Education (529 F. Supp. 1255, 1258-1264 [ED Ark. 1982)
Gilkey 1985
10
Moore 1998c
Lemon v. Kurtzman (403 US 602, 612-613 [1971]).
12
National Academy of Sciences 1984
13
Taylor 1992
Eve & Harrold 1991
Note 3 of Edwards v. Aguillard
14
Taylor 1992
Scott 1994
15
Prelli 1989
16
Scott & Cole 1985
Cole & Scott 1982
Taylor 1992
17
Austin 1994
Morris & Morris 1989
Donaldson 1988
Larson 1989
18
Wise 1998
Numbers 1992
19
Lauden 1983
Numbers 1992
20
Wells 1984
21
Wells 1984
Amicus curiae brief of seventy-two Nobel laureates, seventeen state academies of science, and seven other scientific organizations, in support of appellees, submitted to the Supreme Court of the United States, October term, 1986, as Edwin W. Edwards, in His Official Capacity of Governor of Louisiana, et al., Appellants v. Don Aguillard et al., Appellees. 1986.
Attempts thwarted to limit testimony. (1981). Arkansas Gazette (8 December 1981), p. E10.
Attempts thwarted to limit testimony
8 December
E10
Arkansas Gazette
1981
Austin, S.A. (1994). Grand canyon: Monument to catastrophe. Santee, CA: Institute for Creation Research.
Austin
Grand canyon: Monument to catastrophe
1994
Balanced treatment for creation science and evolution science, Act 590. (1981). Arkansas Stat. Ann., 580-1663 Supp.
Balanced treatment for creation science and evolution science, Act 590
Supp.
580
Arkansas Stat. Ann.
1981
Brummett, J. (1981a). "Creation-science" bill prompted by religious beliefs, sponsor says. Arkansas Gazette, (22 March 1981), p. A1.
Brummett
22 March
A1
Arkansas Gazette
1981
Brummett, J. (1981b). He hasn't read it, but White signs bill on "creation." Arkansas Gazette, (20 March 1981), p. 1.
Brummett
20 March
1
Arkansas Gazette
1981
Cole, H. & Scott, E. (1982). Creation science and scientific research. Phi Beta Kappan, 63, 557-558.
Cole
557
63
Phi Beta Kappan
1982
Creation science act improper, challenger of anti-evolution law says. (1981). Arkansas Gazette, (18 May 1981), p. A1.
Creation science act improper, challenger of anti-evolution law says
18 May
A1
Arkansas Gazette
1981
Creationism in schools: The decision in McLean v. Arkansas Board of Education. (1982). Science, 215, 937.
Creationism in schools: The decision in McLean v. Arkansas Board of Education
937
215
Science
1982
Defendants' trial brief. (1981). McLean v. Arkansas, pp. 23-27.
Donaldson, K. (1988). The creationism controversy: It's only the beginning. School Library Journal, 34 (7), 107-113.
Donaldson
7
107
34
School Library Journal
1988
Eckberg, D. & Nesterenko, A. (1985). For and against evolution: Religion, social class, and the symbolic universe. The Social Science Journal, 22, 1-17.
Eckberg
1
22
The Social Science Journal
1985
Educators criticize creationism bill. (1981). Arkansas Gazette, (3 May 1981), p. 8A.
Educators criticize creationism bill
3 May
8A
Arkansas Gazette
1981
Eve, R.A. & Harrold, F.B. (1991). The Creationist Movement in Modern America. Boston: Twayne Publishers.
Eve
The Creationist Movement in Modern America
1991
Federal judge denies Arkansas creation law. (1982). Moral Majority Report, (25 January 1982), p. 3.
Federal judge denies Arkansas creation law
25 January
3
Moral Majority Report
1982
Gieryn, T.R., Bevins, G.M. & Zehr, S.C. (1985). Professionaliza- tion of American scientists: Public science in the creation/ evolution trials. American Sociological Review, 50, 393-407.10.2307/2095548
393
Gilkey, L. (1985). Creationism on Trial: Evolution and God at Little Rock. New York: Harper & Row. p. 276.
Gilkey
276
Creationism on Trial: Evolution and God at Little Rock
1985
Griffee, C. (1981a). Creationism is not new to instructor: He's been teaching it since 1968. Arkansas Gazette, (12 December 1981), p. E8.
Griffee
12 December
E8
Arkansas Gazette
1981
Griffee, C. (1981b). Creation act is unconstitutional, lawsuit charges. Arkansas Gazette, (28 May 1981), pp. D7-D8.
Griffee
28 May
D7
Arkansas Gazette
1981
Heard, A. (1982). Creationism movement appears to be slowed by loss in Arkansas. Education Week, (17 February 1982), p. 4.
Heard
17 February
4
Education Week
1982
Holtzman, R. & Klasfeld, D. (1983). The Arkansas creationism trial: An overview of the legal and scientific issues. In M. La Follette (Ed.), Creationism, Science and the Law: The Arkansas Case. Cambridge: Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press. pp. 94-107.
Holtzman
The Arkansas creationism trial: An overview of the legal and scientific issues
94
Creationism, Science and the Law: The Arkansas Case
1983
Horowitz, J. (1981). Battle lines drawn over scientific creation- ism in the classroom. Los Angeles Times, (6 March 1981), pp. 5-6.
Horowitz
6 March
5
Los Angeles Times
1981
Irons, P. (1988). The Courage of Their Convictions. New York: The Free Press.
Irons
The Courage of Their Convictions
1988
Kenyon, R. (1981). Trial zeroes in on fundamentalist Christian beliefs. The Milwaukee Journal, (12 December 1981), p. A4.
Kenyon
12 December
A4
The Milwaukee Journal
1981
La Follette, M. (Ed.). (1983). Creationism, Science and the Law: The Arkansas Case. Cambridge: Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press. pp. 2, 102.
La Follette
2
Creationism, Science and the Law: The Arkansas Case
1983
Larson, E.J. (1989). Trial and Error: The American Controversy Over Creation and Evolution (updated edition). New York: Oxford University Press.
Larson
Trial and Error: The American Controversy Over Creation and Evolution (updated edition)
1989
Lauden, L. (1983). Commentary on Ruse: Science at the Bar- causes for concern. In M. La Follette (Ed.), Creationism, Science and the Law: The Arkansas Case. Cambridge: Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press.
Lauden
Commentary on Ruse: Science at the Barcauses for concern
Creationism, Science and the Law: The Arkansas Case
1983
Law on creation theory proves boon for governor of Arkansas. (1981). The New York Times, (22 March 1981), p. A26.
Law on creation theory proves boon for governor of Arkansas
22 March
A26
The New York Times
1981
Luxenberg, S. (1981). The Arkansas creationist story actually has its origin in S.C. The Sun [Baltimore], (10 December 1981), pp. C13-C14.
Luxenberg
10 December
C13
The Sun [Baltimore]
1981
Miller, J. (1987). Scientific literacy in the United States. In D. Evered & M. O'Connor (Eds.), Communicating Science to the Public. New York: Wiley. pp. 19-40.
Miller
Scientific literacy in the United States
19
Communicating Science to the Public
1987
Monkey trial seen in suit over Act 590. (1981). Arkansas Gazette (29 July 1981), p. A1.
Monkey trial seen in suit over Act 590
29 July
A1
Arkansas Gazette
1981
Moore, R. (1998a). Creationism in the United States. I. Banning evolution from the classroom. The American Biology Teacher, 60(7), 486-507.
Moore
7
486
60
The American Biology Teacher
1998
Moore, R. (1998b). Creationism in the United States. II. The aftermath of the Scopes trial. The American Biology Teacher, 60(8), 568-577.
Moore
8
568
60
The American Biology Teacher
1998
Moore, R. (1998c). Creationism in the United States. III. The ban on teaching evolution reaches the U.S. Supreme Court. The American Biology Teacher, 60(9), 650-661.
Moore
9
650
60
The American Biology Teacher
1998
Moore, R. (1998d). The influence of the Scopes trial on biology textbooks. In R.M. Cornelius, The Scopes Trial: A Challenge for American Education. Symposium held in Dayton, TN on 17 July 1998. Dayton, TN: Bryan College.
Moore
The influence of the Scopes trial on biology textbooks
The Scopes Trial: A Challenge for American Education
1998
Moore, R. (1999a). Creationism in the United States. IV. The aftermath Epperson v. Arkansas. The American Biology Teacher, 61(1), 00-00.
Moore
1
00
61
The American Biology Teacher
1999
Moore, R. (1999b). Creationism in the United States. VI. Demanding "balanced treatment." The American Biology Teacher, 61(1), 10-16.
Moore
1
10
61
The American Biology Teacher
1999
Morris, H.M. & Morris, J.D. (1989). Science, Scripture, and the Young Earth. El Cajon, CA: Institute for Creation Research.
Morris
Science, Scripture, and the Young Earth
1989
National Academy of Sciences. (1984). Science and Creationism: A View from the National Academy of Sciences. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
National Academy of Sciences
Science and Creationism: A View from the National Academy of Sciences
1984
Nelkin. D. (1982). The Creation Controversy: Science or Scripture in the Schools? New York: Norton. pp. 112, 143.
Nelkin
112
The Creation Controversy: Science or Scripture in the Schools?
1982
No help needed on Act 590. (1981). Arkansas Gazette (3 June 1981), p. A3.
No help needed on Act 590
3 June
A3
Arkansas Gazette
1981
Novik, J.D. (1983). Litigating the religion of creation science. Federation of American Societies of Experimental Biology Proceed- ings, 42, 3041.
Novik
3041
42
Federation of American Societies of Experimental Biology Proceedings
1983
Numbers, R. (1992). The Creationists: The Evolution of Scientific Creationism. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Numbers
The Creationists: The Evolution of Scientific Creationism
1992
Overton, W.R. (1985). Memorandum opinion of United States District Judge William R. Overton in McLean v. Arkansas, 5 January 1982. In L. Gilkey (Ed.), Creationism on Trial: Evolution and God at Little Rock. New York: Harper & Row.
Overton
Memorandum opinion of United States District Judge William R. Overton in McLean v. Arkansas, 5 January 1982
Creationism on Trial: Evolution and God at Little Rock
1985
Pope, J. (1982). Creationism isn't dead yet. The Times-Picayune [New Orleans] (6 January 1982), p. A1.
Pope
6 January
A1
The Times-Picayune [New Orleans]
1982
Prelli, L.J. (1989). Practicing rhetorical invention: Creating scien- tifically reasonable claims. In A Rhetoric of Science: Inventing Scientific Discourse. Columbia: University of South Carolina Press. pp. 218-257.
Prelli
Practicing rhetorical invention: Creating scientifically reasonable claims
218
A Rhetoric of Science: Inventing Scientific Discourse
1989
Putting "Creation-science" to Rest. (1984). Arkansas Gazette, (7 January 1984), p. A1.
Putting "Creation-science" to Rest
7 January
A1
Arkansas Gazette
1984
Republican candidate picks fight with Darwin. (1980). Science, 12 September 1980, p. 1214.
Republican candidate picks fight with Darwin
12 September
1214
Science
1980
Scott, E. & Cole, H. (1985). The elusive basis of creation science. Quarterly Review of Biology, 60, 21-30.10.2307/2827599
21
Scott, E.C. (1994). The struggle for the schools. Natural History, 7/94, 10-13.
Scott
94
10
7
Natural History
1994
Sehlstedt, A. (1981). In the beginning ... What? When? How? Questions split creationists and scientists. The Sun [Baltimore], (6 December 1981), pp. G3-G5.
Sehlstedt
6 December
G3
The Sun [Baltimore]
1981
Seventy five news organizations register to cover trial. (1981). Arkansas Gazette, 20 December 1981, p. A2.
Seventy five news organizations register to cover trial
20 December
A2
Arkansas Gazette
1981
Stuart, R. (1981). U.S. court to hear arguments on creationism. The New York Times, (7 December 1981), pp. A4, A21.
Stuart
7 December
A4
The New York Times
1981
Taylor, C.A. (1992). Of audience, expertise and authority: The evolving creationism debate. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 78, 277-295.
Taylor
277
78
Quarterly Journal of Speech
1992
Taylor, C.A. & Condit, C.M. (1988). Objectivity and elites: A creation science trial. Critical Studies in Mass Communication, 5, 293-312.
Taylor
293
5
Critical Studies in Mass Communication
1988
Trimble, M. (1981). Keeps trial moving: Mother was a teacher. Arkansas Gazette, (18 December 1981), p. F8.
Trimble
18 December
F8
Arkansas Gazette
1981
Wells, G. (1981). Testimony ends: Ruling promised as soon as possible. Arkansas Gazette, (18 December 1981), pp. E10-Ell.
Wells
18 December
E10
Arkansas Gazette
1981
Wells, G. (1984). Made decision on ruling in "creation-science" case early, Overton indicates. Arkansas Gazette, (4 February 1984), p. A1.
Wells
4 February
A1
Arkansas Gazette
1984
Willard, C.A. (1996). Liberalism and the Problem of Knowledge: A New Rhetoric for Modern Democracy. Univ. of Chicago Press: Chicago.
Willard
Liberalism and the Problem of Knowledge: A New Rhetoric for Modern Democracy
1996
Wise, D.L. (1998). Creationism's geological time scale. American Scientist, 86 (March-April), 160-173.
Wise
March
160
86
American Scientist
1998
This content is only available via PDF.

Article PDF first page preview

Article PDF first page preview