The idea for launching Studies in Late Antiquity crystallized gradually over the past decade as a response to the increasingly expansive horizons of the field. As scholars of Late Antiquity, we have grown accustomed to the methodological diversity of our field, which has long embraced the perspectives of Archaeology, History, Classics, Philosophy, Religious Studies, and Art History. But because of this very diversity, we rarely find ourselves assembled in a single place. And, ironically, the more we found ourselves working with colleagues studying other regions, either as we try to address their ideas within our own work or to work collaboratively, the more we saw the need for a venue that would highlight the shared empirical, historiographic, and methodological concerns that hold the field together, however uneasily. Which assumptions and theoretical perspectives do we hold in common and where do various scholarly traditions diverge? Are there problems or themes that...
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
Spring 2017
Research Article|
February 01 2017
Why Does the World Need a New Journal on Late Antiquity?
Studies in Late Antiquity (2017) 1 (1): 1–3.
Citation
Why Does the World Need a New Journal on Late Antiquity?. Studies in Late Antiquity 1 February 2017; 1 (1): 1–3. doi: https://doi.org/10.1525/sla.2017.1.1.1
Download citation file:
Sign in
Don't already have an account? Register
Client Account
You could not be signed in. Please check your email address / username and password and try again.
Could not validate captcha. Please try again.